A central question in the study of altruism has been whether there is a systematic gender difference in giving behavior. Many experiments, using a modified version of the dictator game, have revealed an interesting pattern: male subjects are more altruistic when the price of giving is low and female subjects are more altruistic when the price of giving is high. In the modified dictator game, however, a key variable in a person’s decision to give is what that person expects to receive. Systematic differences in those expectations may contribute to systematic differences in altruistic behavior. We show that gender differences in these expectations are, indeed, part of the larger story in exploring gender differences in altruistic giving. When expectations of receiving are endogenous, we replicate the standard finding. When expectations of receiving are uniform rather than endogenous, gender differences in price sensitivity disappear: male and female dictators give equal amounts regardless of the relative price of giving. This suggests that gender differences in expectations about others’ giving are part of the larger pattern of giving behavior.
Article navigation
26 March 2018
Research Article|
March 26 2018
Gender, Expectations, and the Price of Giving
Mary L. Rigdon;
Mary L. Rigdon
Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science
, Piscataway, NJ, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Adam Seth Levine
Adam Seth Levine
Department of Government,
Cornell University
, Ithaca, NJ, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
*
The authors would like to Ragan Petrie, Lise Vesterlund, the participants at the Economic Science Association meeting (Tucson), and for funding, the Institute for Research on Women and Gender at the University of Michigan.
Online ISSN: 2326-6201
Print ISSN: 2326-6198
© 2018 M. L. Rigdon and A. S. Levine
2018
M. L. Rigdon and A. S. Levine
Licensed re-use rights only
Review of Behavioral Economics (2018) 5 (1): 39–59.
Citation
Rigdon ML, Levine AS (2018), "Gender, Expectations, and the Price of Giving". Review of Behavioral Economics, Vol. 5 No. 1 pp. 39–59, doi: https://doi.org/10.1561/105.00000078
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
How peer monitoring and punishment affect the performance of the group contract: An experimental study on the control of non-point source pollution
China Agricultural Economic Review (February,2018)
Behavioral finance: insights from experiments II: biases, moods and emotions
Review of Behavioral Finance (November,2015)
Behavioral finance: insights from experiments I: theory and financial markets
Review of Behavioral Finance (June,2015)
Related Chapters
Macroeconomics in the Laboratory
Experiments in Macroeconomics
Experiments on Expectations in Macroeconomics and Finance
Experiments in Macroeconomics
Persistence of Shocks in an Experimental Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Economy
Experiments in Macroeconomics
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
