Article navigation
Purpose

This paper aims to provide a holistic framework and systematic analysis of large-format additive manufacturing (LFAM) technologies, bridging the gap between equipment systems, processing methodologies and materials.

Design/methodology/approach

The review constructs a systematic analysis by proposing a novel classification framework for LFAM equipment based on kinematic configurations and systematically comparing three core process strategies: monolithic deposition, segment-and-assemble and distributed and cooperative printing.

Findings

The study establishes a taxonomy of LFAM systems (workpiece-fixed, workpiece-moving and system-moving) and elucidates their tradeoffs. It highlights methodological convergence and scale-dependent tradeoffs in efficiency and thermal control, revealing persistent bottlenecks in computational scalability, process-structure coupling and multi-system coordination.

Social implications

text

Originality/value

This review provides a novel holistic framework that connects critical domains of LFAM and guides systematic decision-making, urging the adoption of AI-driven, digital-twin-enabled control architectures and standardized benchmarking.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Pay-Per-View Access
$41.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options