Open figure viewer
“The quality of reviews of the eighth edition was frankly very low; only a handful of reviewers offered an appraisal based on detailed examination. So the plea to reviewers of the ninth edition is to assist the compiler by making accurate and realistic comments that can be taken into account for the tenth edition.” So, that is us put in our place. We did our best (95/360, also 91/172 for the seventh edition), but here we go again. Of course, we could try saying that the compiler has so obviously got it right that we can find nothing to quibble...
You do not currently have access to this content.
