Article navigation

A largely negative review of the first edition of Michael Ferber's A Dictionary of Literary Symbols (1999), authored by the present reviewer, appeared in this journal in 2000 (RR 2000/124). My objections ranged from the lack of an index, the selective nature of the entries, and concluded that Cambridge “ought to have produced a less idiosyncratic and more scholarly volume”, a more comprehensive one which “clearly stated” the secondary sources being drawn upon, “one which drew less on diverse references in non‐English literatures and was more clearly focused”. Mine must have been one of the few negative assessments. The...

You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options