Although Odum Library has had a strong instruction program for many years, it has lacked any form of evaluation other than statistics. The Odum Library Instruction Team made creation of such an evaluation system a high priority last year and devised tools that could assess many aspects of instruction. The tools created included end‐of‐class surveys for measuring student satisfaction, self‐evaluation forms, peer‐evaluation forms for constructive feedback, and class‐specific evaluation forms. Once these tools were in place, the Instruction Team needed a way to organize and analyze the information; after a review of literature and materials from the ACRL Institute for Information Literacy, a program portfolio was devised. The purpose of the portfolio, items included in the portfolio, selling the portfolio to the entire Reference Team, and tips for creating a portfolio are discussed.
Article navigation
1 December 2001
Case Report|
December 01 2001
The portfolio: an instruction program assessment tool Available to Purchase
Julie M. Chapman;
Julie M. Chapman
Julie M. Chapman (e‐mail: jmchapma@valdosta.edu) is a Reference Librarian/Instructor of Library Science, Odum Library at Valdosta State University, Valdosta, Georgia, USA.
Search for other works by this author on:
Charlcie Pettway;
Charlcie Pettway
Charlcie Pettway (e‐mail: cpettway@valdosta.edu) is a Reference Librarian/Instructor of Library Science, Odum Library at Valdosta State University, Valdosta, Georgia, USA.
Search for other works by this author on:
Michelle White
Michelle White
Michelle White (e‐mail: mwhite54@hotmail.com) is Former Reference Librarian, at Valdosta State University, Valdosta, Georgia, USA.
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 2054-1716
Print ISSN: 0090-7324
© MCB UP Limited
2001
Reference Services Review (2001) 29 (4): 294–300.
Citation
Chapman JM, Pettway C, White M (2001), "The portfolio: an instruction program assessment tool ". Reference Services Review, Vol. 29 No. 4 pp. 294–300, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006491
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Teaching the teachers: teaching and learning online
Reference Services Review (December,2004)
Course‐centered approach to evaluating university library collections for instructional program reviews
Collection Building (December,2003)
Web site redesign: the University of Washington Libraries' experience
OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives (July,2006)
Expanding the reference vocabulary: A methodology for applying Bloom's taxonomy to increase instruction in the reference interview
Reference Services Review (February,2011)
Needs assessment of library instruction at Texas A&M University Libraries using student feedback
Performance Measurement and Metrics (July,2009)
Related Chapters
Building a European Professional Identity – Experiences from the Intensive Program
Engaging Dissonance: Developing Mindful Global Citizenship in Higher Education
Never Say Never: The Appropriate and Inappropriate Use of Praise and Feedback for Students with Learning and Behavioral Disabilities
Instructional Practices with and without Empirical Validity
Performance Management: A Marriage between Practice and Science – Just Say “I do”
Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
