Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

This study aims to generate evidence-based guidance for climate-responsive residential building design by comparing the energy and carbon performance of alternative wall-envelope materials across diverse climatic contexts.

Design/methodology/approach

A residential prototype was modelled as a case study and assessed for embodied carbon, cradle-to-grave environmental impacts and operational energy demand under projected future climate scenarios for the 2020s, 2050s and 2080s, incorporating anticipated changes in the electricity supply mix. Wall material alternatives were subsequently prioritised using a multi-criteria performance comparison.

Findings

Adobe bricks, AAC blocks and fly ash bricks demonstrated the highest overall efficiency across embodied carbon, operational energy and life-cycle impact parameters. Climate-aligned grid decarbonisation could reduce operational carbon emissions by up to 39%. In contrast, neglecting climate change results in an underestimation of electricity consumption by 9% over a 75-year building life-cycle.

Originality/value

This study evaluates wall material performance by combining future climate-responsive energy simulation with life-cycle environmental assessment in a scenario-based analysis. The results across multiple Indian climatic zones provide context-specific insights for low-carbon residential design.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal