We present a modeling approach for generating robust predictions about how changes in institutional, economic, and political considerations will influence the outcome of political negotiations over complex water-ecosystem policy debates. Evaluating the political viability of proposed policies is challenging for researchers in these complex natural and political environments; there is limited information with which to map policies to outcomes to utilities or to represent the political process adequately. Our analysis evaluates the viability of policy options using a probabilistic political viability criterion that explicitly recognizes the existence of modeling uncertainty. The approach is used to conduct a detailed case study of the future of California’s Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Several other possible applications of the approach are briefly discussed.
Modeling Negotiations Over Water and Ecosystem Management: Uncertainty and Political Viability Available to Purchase
This research was supported in part by the Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics. The authors thank Jim Chalfant, Richard Howitt, Jeffrey LaFrance, Anthony Millner, Christian Traeger, and Jeffrey Williams for helpful conversations and the participants of the Five College Junior Economics Faculty Seminar, the participants of the UC Davis Ag-IO workshop, the editors of SBE and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. Kathy Edgington and Laurie Warren provided invaluable computer resources support.
Goodhue RE, Sayre SS, Simon LK (2016), "Modeling Negotiations Over Water and Ecosystem Management: Uncertainty and Political Viability". Strategic Behavior and the Environment, Vol. 6 No. 1-2 pp. 73–134, doi: https://doi.org/10.1561/102.00000067
Download citation file:
