Within a decade, Apple twice changed its mind about where the boundaries of the firm should lie. In 2010 the company introduced an Apple-designed custom “system on a chip” (SoC) for its iPhone and iPad products, which replaced non-customized Samsung chips. Then in 2020, Apple announced that it would end its 15-year partnership with Intel and begin designing the microprocessors inside its new Mac computers. This was the second time Apple had switched microprocessors in its computers. From 1994 to 2005, Apple computers ran on IBM PowerPC microprocessors, which were incompatible with the dominant Intel x86 chip architecture. At the time, Apple had only a 4 percent share of the personal computer market. In 2005, the company announced it would switch its Mac computers to Intel chips to take advantage of Intel's industry-standard architecture and superior product roadmap, which would enable Apple to build the products it envisioned. In November 2020, Apple unveiled three Mac computers that used its new custom M1 processor. Apple's custom chip contained numerous special-purpose accelerators that enabled performance and capabilities not accessible with off-the-shelf chips. As it did when it switched to Intel microprocessors, Apple provided software emulation technology that enabled existing Intel-based apps to run on the new Macs until they were updated to work with the new Apple chips. Huawei and Samsung had developed custom SoCs for their smartphones, but no other personal computer company followed Apple's path.
Article navigation
Case Study|
August 01 2022
Apple's custom chips : A Genius Decision? Available to Purchase
This case was prepared by Professor Meghan Busse and Susan Springer.
Received:
April 24 2025
Accepted:
April 24 2025
Online ISSN: 1111-111X
Print ISSN: 1111-111X
© The Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University
2022
Northwestern University
Cases are developed solely as the basis for class discussion and are not intended to serve as endorsements, sources of primary data, or illustrations of effective or ineffective management. This case was based on publicly available information. For pedagogical purposes, the authors might have fictionalized individuals, conversations, strategies, assessments, or other details. To order copies or to request permission to reproduce materials, call 847.491.5400, or email cases@kellogg.northwestern.edu. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form or by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the permission of Kellogg Case Publishing.
Teaching Notes 1–9.
Article history
Received:
April 24 2025
Accepted:
April 24 2025
Connected Content
Teaching Notes:
Apple's custom chips : A Genius Decision?
See also
-
relatedCaseResource
Citation
Busse M, Springer S (2022;), "Apple's custom chips : A Genius Decision?". Teaching Notes, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.
Download citation file:
Email alerts
Suggested Reading
Algorithmic Management in Action: The Reorganization of Allstate's Data Group
Teaching Notes (February,2021)
Crescendo: Steinway's Growth Strategy
Teaching Notes (March,2023)
Modelo: Finding a Fighting Spirit
Teaching Notes (April,2023)
OpenAI: Creating the Product Roadmap for ChatGPT
Teaching Notes (October,2024)
Patel Brothers:The Legacy and Challenges of a 50-Year-Old Retail Brand Serving the Indian Diaspora in the US
Teaching Notes (November,2024)
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
