Continuous improvement groups are teams of employees with special responsibility for improving quality. This paper reports on the first 12 months of a pilot implementation by Land Rover and gives the main results of initial interviews with team members. The analysis concentrates on the attitudes of members who were previously active participants in the quality circle programme, which was formally closed at the end of 1996. The main finding at this stage of the pilot was that these employees welcomed the increased structure and management control of continuous improvement groups where it facilitated improvements to quality consistent with Rover Group’s business goals. Such willingness to accept reduced autonomy in exchange for increased employee involvement and contribution is explained by characterising continuous improvement groups as a stewardship approach to quality management.
Article navigation
Research Article|
February 01 1999
Employee response to continuous improvement groups Available to Purchase
Geraldine Hammersley;
Geraldine Hammersley
Geraldine Hammersley is a Senior Lecturer in Human Resource Management, Coventry Business School, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
Ashly Pinnington
Ashly Pinnington
Ashly Pinnington is a Lecturer in Management, Department of Business and Management, School of Business and Economics, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6887
Print ISSN: 0954-478X
© MCB UP Limited
1999
The TQM Magazine (1999) 11 (1): 29–34.
Citation
Hammersley G, Pinnington A (1999), "Employee response to continuous improvement groups". The TQM Magazine, Vol. 11 No. 1 pp. 29–34, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09544789910246606
Download citation file:
278
Views
Suggested Reading
The apparatus business in BT – a team story
Team Performance Management: An International Journal (September,1995)
Performance improvement. Part 1. Forget the acronyms
Industrial Management & Data Systems (June,1999)
Quality control, assurance and assessment – the link to continuous improvement
Quality Assurance in Education (December,1995)
Conceptual problems of continuous quality improvement and innovation in higher education
Quality Assurance in Education (June,1998)
Total quality management in European healthcare
Int J Health Care Qual Assur (April,2000)
Related Chapters
Mitigating Stress Effects on Team Cohesion
Team Cohesion: Advances in Psychological Theory, Methods and Practice
The Importance of Time in Team Leadership Research
Team Dynamics Over Time
Concluding Remarks Setting the Scene: The Calculus of Agreement in Group Negotiation
Negotiation and Groups
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
