Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

This study seeks to investigate the challenges and benefits of Quality 4.0 within industrial companies, including the influence of the Industry 5.0 concept and exploring critically the emergence of Quality 5.0. Based on identified research gaps, it proposes a research agenda.

Design/methodology/approach

This study employed both bibliometric and systematic literature reviews, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework on Quality 4.0, its reviews and Quality 5.0.

Findings

This research contributes to the existing body of knowledge on Quality 4.0 by analyzing pertinent literature. About 14 groups were identified to establish a research agenda, with suggested research questions. Key findings include the proposition of the “Targeted Data” concept, the discussion of Quality 4.0 in the context of Industry 5.0, with information overload, human-centered and sustainability issues and a critical view of the Quality 5.0 concept.

Research limitations/implications

This study was unable to determine the costs or investments involved in implementing Quality 4.0.

Originality/value

This article is original in its proposition of applying “Targeted Data” to quality management, in its distinct conceptualization of Quality 4.0 compared to existing literature, in its analysis of Industry 5.0 implication for Quality 4.0 and as the first review to consider the incipient proposition of Quality 5.0.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal