Public heritage facilities – national parks, art galleries, museums and so on – are now required by professional accounting standards in Australia to be valued and included in government general purpose financial statements as assets. This study challenges the appropriateness of such an accounting treatment in relation to the SAC4 definition of assets and the purported usefulness of the information. Instead it is argued that these facilities are public goods, and that commercial accounting principles should not be applied to them. The article explains the nature and significance of public goods and how they differ from private goods. It explains why commercial accounting principles are irrelevant for public heritage facilities because their objectives are social rather than financial and why commercial valuations are irrelevant and unreliable if applied to them. Finally, it is contended that the facilities are assets held in trust for the nation by government and hence should not be included in its general purpose financial reports.
Article navigation
1 May 2000
Editors
Conceptual Paper|
May 01 2000
Accounting for public heritage facilities – assets or liabilities of the government? Available to Purchase
Allan D. Barton
Allan D. Barton
Department of Commerce, Faculty of Economics and Commerce, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-4205
Print ISSN: 1368-0668
© MCB UP Limited
2000
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal (2000) 13 (2): 219–236.
Citation
Barton AD (2000), "Accounting for public heritage facilities – assets or liabilities of the government?". Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 13 No. 2 pp. 219–236, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570010323434
Download citation file:
1,676
Views
Suggested Reading
Men in white coats … men in grey suits: New public management and the funding of science and technology services to the UK Government
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal (August,1998)
The influence of the German Federal Court of Audit (FCA) on policy decisions
Managerial Auditing Journal (December,1995)
Public private partnerships: an introduction
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal (August,2003)
On the social value of biological control of weeds
International Journal of Social Economics (July,1998)
Collective action and tropical deforestation
International Journal of Social Economics (July,1997)
Related Chapters
The Public Sector Accounting, Accountability and Auditing in Emerging Economies: Insights, Gaps and Some New Ways Forward
The Public Sector Accounting, Accountability and Auditing in Emerging Economies
The Influence of Fraud on Bond Yield in the New Information Age: Evidence From Municipal Bond Issuances
Advances in Taxation (Volume 32)
Diffusion of the Cash Basis International Public Sector Accounting Standard (IPSAS) in Less Developed Countries (LDCs) – The Case of the Nepali Central Government
The Public Sector Accounting, Accountability and Auditing in Emerging Economies
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
