Skip to article sections

High-resolution radiography, a noninvasive medical technology, plays a crucial role in diagnosing and determining treatment plans for tumors and other diseases. Super-resolution images recovered from low-resolution samples would be a more economical direction to explore. This paper proposes the depthwise convolution multiscale network transformer (D-MNet Transformer) for super-resolution tasks in radiological images. First, the D-MNet encoder is specifically designed to adapt to the data distribution of radiological images, excelling at detecting subtle alterations within the local areas of the skeletal structure and fusing information at various scales. First, to better adapt to the distribution of radiological images, the D-MNet encoder excels in detecting subtle alterations within the local areas of the skeletal structure and fusing information at various scales. Then, the transformer-based decoder integrates global contextual information for reconstruction. Furthermore, this paper proposes a task-specific pixel-level masking strategy to enhance model performance when training on small data sets. Experimental results demonstrate that this method achieves state-of-the-art performance in PSNR.

Medical imaging techniques, including radiograph, ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) (Hou et al., 2022) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), play a crucial role in disease screening, diagnosis (Lee et al., 2023), treatment planning and clinical evaluation (Suárez et al., 2023; Xie et al., 2023). Beyond the radiologist’s expertise, image quality is vital for precise diagnostic outcomes, particularly in X-ray imaging (Huang et al., 2022b). Low-resolution (LR) images often contain excessive noise, which can hinder the detection and analysis of critical structures. Consequently, radiologists may overlook or misdiagnose small tumors or lesions due to insufficient resolution. In contrast, high-resolution (HR) images offer enhanced clarity and detail, facilitating more accurate disease diagnosis and treatment planning for healthcare professionals. Single-image super-resolution reconstruction (SISR) would be desirable for solving this problem, by increasing the image resolution (Li et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2021b).

SISR (Chen et al., 2022; Huang et al., 2022a; Liu et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2020; Yu et al., 2023) aims to address the challenge of recovering HR images with enhanced detail from LR and HR image pairs. Recently, convolutional neural network (CNN)-based super-resolution (SR) models (Behjati et al., 2023, 2021; Dong et al., 2015, 2016; Lim et al., 2017; Sun et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2018) have demonstrated remarkable performance in this domain. The advent of generative adversarial networks (GANs) has further advanced the field (Huang et al., 2021; Ledig et al., 2017). The integration of transformer architectures (Gao et al., 2022; Liang et al., 2021) into the SR discipline has garnered increasing interest from researchers due to their capacity to generate images with greater detail.

However, several challenges persist in the SR task for radiology images:

  • First, X-ray images typically exhibit high contrast, where the edges and textural details of bones and other hard tissues are crucial for diagnosis. However, current SR baseline methods, primarily tailored for normal images, fall short in adequately addressing the intricate textural details when adapted to the X-ray images SR tasks.

  • Furthermore, the small sample training data sets in real-world radiograph SR reconstruction tasks make neural network generalization capability limited.

In this study, we introduced a novel paradigm for SR tasks in radiometric images, called the depthwise (DW) convolution multiscale network Transformer: D-MNet Transformer (see Figure 1). Unlike previous methods, our proposed approach is dedicated to representing and extracting fine-grained local structures in X-ray images, such as skeletal features. Initially, local feature information is represented within the spatial features of each channel. Subsequently, pointwise convolution, using 1 × 1 convolution kernels, combines these features across channels (Chen et al., 2023), thus enhancing feature representation capabilities without losing local information. Traditional feature extraction modules based on conventional convolution often focus on blending local and global features in latent spaces, which negatively impacts the reconstruction performance. On the other hand, we integrate a UNet architecture within the feature extraction head to enhance the representation of shallow features. The UNet, with its multi-layered structure, captures image features at various scales and employs skip connections to directly map features from the encoder to the decoder, preserving the integrity of low-level features. This multiscale processing is particularly crucial for detail-rich X-ray images, where maintaining the fidelity of subtle features is essential for accurate analysis.

In addition, we explore the pixel-level masking strategy utilized in this pipeline. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first mask training method proposed for radiology images. This strategy strengthens model robustness for limited sample training data sets by randomly masking pixels in separate feature channels, without requiring additional convolution operations that would increase model consumption. Furthermore, our strategy follows the D-MNet principles reducing its dependency on neighboring pixels for local feature representation. This is achieved by employing random masking, which guides the model in generating a diverse range of latent feature representations.

The key contributions of this paper can be summarized as follows:

  • We propose a shallow feature encoder, D-MNet, for radiological images. This module is specifically designed for the representation and extraction of fine local features in radiographic images. It adeptly uses spatial information representation within individual channels, coupled with pointwise convolution for seamless integration. In addition, the UNet framework further extracts features across multiple scales. Experimental results show that our encoder with separated channel information achieves better performance in the data distribution for a given task.

  • We introduce a pixel-level masking strategy for medical radiology images to enhance generative capabilities with small sample training data sets. The proposed pixel-level masking strategy for the radiographic SR task allows introducing interference to enhance the robustness of the model with limited samples while preserving spatial information in key regions of the radiographic image. On the other hand, the implementation of a pixel-level masking strategy aids the model in reducing its dependency on neighboring pixels for local feature representation.

  • We present a novel model for the radiographic SR task, the D-MNet Transformer, which incorporates the D-MNet based encoder and the transformer decoder. The utilization of a pixel-level masking strategy further improves the SR performance of the model. According to experimental results, our method generates radiometric images with more detailed information. It achieves state-of-the-art performance in PSNR metrics (upsampling factor: ×2 and ×4), surpassing competing approaches.

SISR models:SISR is a classic vision task that aims to reconstruct an HR image from a given LR image. The introduction of deep learning-based approaches, which do not rely on carefully selected prior knowledge, has significantly advanced the field. Initially, shallow neural networks were introduced, surpassing the performance of traditional methods at the time (Dong et al., 2015, 2016). Subsequently, models with deeper structures were proposed to explore the potential of deeper networks in fitting data distributions. The incorporation of attention mechanisms further enhanced the models’ responsiveness to local and global features (Behjati et al., 2023; Lim et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2018). Concurrently, the application of GANs to this task has garnered increased attention, with GANs (Ledig et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2021a, 2018) achieving remarkable results in recovering image details through an adversarial training strategy that deviates from traditional CNN-based models. Recently, the exceptional performance of transformer-based methods (Gao et al., 2022; Liang et al., 2021) in capturing global contextual information has also attracted growing interest in SR tasks. However, most of the popular methods focus on universal images. When these methods are applied to radiographic images, the model performance is limited because of the data domain shift. The principles of SR have also been successfully applied to various medical imaging modalities, such as enhancing CT image quality by jointly handling denoising and SR (Chi et al., 2024; Nagayama et al., 2025), or improving PET image analysis (Yu et al., 2025, 2024). Nonetheless, directly applying these models to radiographic images often yields suboptimal results due to unique domain characteristics. Therefore, it is necessary to propose models specifically designed for SR tasks in the given radiographic images.

Masking strategy: Drawing inspiration from masked language modeling in the field of natural language processing (Brown et al., 2020; Radford et al., 2018, 2019), the domain of computer vision has begun to explore masked image modeling (Bao et al., 2021; Dong et al., 2022; He et al., 2022), which is also regarded as a paradigm for self-supervised learning (Bachmann et al., 2022; Dong et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2023). The advantage of a masking strategy is its ability to enhance the robustness of CNN-based models, which proves beneficial for downstream tasks like object detection (He et al., 2017; Zhong et al., 2020). These strategies have also been demonstrated to be effective in low-level vision tasks, such as image restoration (Wang et al., 2023). In the radiographic SR task, the previous block masking strategy tends to lose too much spatial information because of the large masking area. Our pixel-level masking strategy enhances the model performance by considering the radiographic image channel information independently, and the pixel masking on the independent channels.

In this section, we will present the D-MNet used by this model for shallow local feature encoding and the pixel-level masking strategy applied to this specific task, respectively. Then, we will illustrate the transformer-based decoder for capturing global contextual information. Finally, we will also discuss the loss function used for model training.

For D-MNet, our objective is to enhance the capability of shallow feature extraction, specifically focusing on the representation and extraction of fine local structures within X-ray images, including skeletal formations. The D-MNet is constructed from a series of DW separable convolution blocks, a design choice motivated by both efficiency and the specific nature of radiographic images. Our core hypothesis is that the distinct anatomical components in radiographs – such as dense bone, soft tissue and air gaps – are best captured by specialized feature detectors.

Depthwise separable convolutions facilitate this by decoupling spatial filtering from cross-channel feature interaction. The DW convolution step allows each feature channel to learn an independent spatial filter, effectively becoming a specialized detector. Some channels may evolve to detect high-frequency bone boundaries and trabecular patterns, while others may specialize in modeling the low-frequency variations of soft tissue or identifying specific noise characteristics. The subsequent pointwise convolution then acts as a learned linear combination, intelligently fusing these disentangled feature maps to form a rich, multi-faceted representation. This separation prevents the network from learning “averaged” or overly generalized filters and instead encourages the creation of a diverse feature basis, which is crucial for high-fidelity reconstruction of complex medical imagery. This encoder-decoder structure, which first expands channel depth to a bottleneck and then symmetrically contracts it, forces the model to learn a powerful and compressed representation from this specialized feature set. As a fundamental component, the shallow feature encoder uses DW separable convolution (Chollet, 2017). The advantage of DW separable convolution is that it preserves more feature responses of the radiometric image on separate channels by concentrating on the convolution operation for each channel individually. According to the experimental results, respecting these separations more in the radiographic image SR task is beneficial. On the other hand, the DW separable convolution operation proves more beneficial for improving the reconstruction quality of SR images compared to the CNN-based local feature extraction module or the well-designed attention-based mechanism module (see Section 4.4). The proposed encoder incorporates a UNet structure, where multiscale feature extraction and interlayer skip connections further assist the model in concentrating on the diversity of scale in low-level features and maintaining the integrity of these foundational characteristics.

The detailed architecture of our D-MNet module is illustrated in Figure 2. The module is structured as an encoder-decoder network, composed of a sub-encoder (θD) and a sub-decoder (θE). The sub-encoder implements a multi-scale feature extraction strategy, processing the input through a series of depthwise separable convolution layers. As depicted, the feature channels progressively increase from 36- to a 1024-dimensional bottleneck and then symmetrically decrease, forcing the network to learn a compressed yet rich feature representation. The sub-decoder then utilizes a combination of depthwise separable convolutions and convolution transpose layers to reconstruct the feature representation back towards its original dimensionality. The entire D-MNet block is encompassed by a global skip connection, which adds the original input to the decoder’s output. This residual learning design, reminiscent of U-Net principles, is crucial for preserving high-frequency details and stabilizing the training process by allowing the module to focus on learning the modification rather than the entire transformation. By using feature channel scale magnification, the module is able to capture a more comprehensive range of pattern information throughout the spatial domain. The formalization for D-MNet can be described as follows: Let C=c1,c2,,cn be a set of channel numbers for nDW convolution operations. For the ithDW convolution operation, we obtain an intermediate feature map fi:

(1)

where * denotes convolution, Ik is the kth channel of the input masked LR image ILRxlr, Ki,k is the kth channel of the ithDW convolution kernel, and (x,y) are the spatial coordinates in the feature map.

The D-MNet pseudo-code is also presented in Algorithm 1. Given a masked LR image ILRRW×H×C, where RW×H×C represents the number of channels and the spatial resolution, respectively. In our experiment, the value of C is 3. D-MNet initially extracts feature Z0 using a DW convolution operation with a filter size of 3×3. In the subencoder, we aim to optimize the parameter θD by minimizing the risk. As illustrated in equation (2), L denotes a loss function that depends on the parameter θ. IHRxhr refers to the HR image, and E signifies the operation of taking the average for all xlr in the mini-batch. Similarly, we seek to optimize the parameter θE for the sub-decoder:

Algorithm 1: D-MNet pseudocode.

For the pixel-level masking strategy, our goal is to enhance the model’s performance on small sample training data sets by introducing perturbations to the channel feature maps. The pixel-level masking strategy also aids the model in reducing its reliance on neighboring pixels for local feature representation. Using random masks guides the model to generate diverse latent feature representations. Given that radiometric images exhibit dense local spatial domain responses (Huang et al., 2022b), we propose a masking strategy suitable for this specific SR task. Unlike previous block-based masking strategies (He et al., 2017; Zhong et al., 2020), our approach focuses on the pixel level. Based on experimental results, we found that block-based masking strategies can result in the loss of contextual information in the core region, making decoding more challenging. To address this issue, we perform masking operations on images at the pixel level. This approach offers the advantage of introducing perturbation to enhance the model’s robustness with limited training data, while minimizing the disruption to core spatial information. Moreover, this pixel-level masking strategy on feature channels also better preserves pattern information in radiometric images on separate channels, aligning with the design principles of D-MNet.

The pseudocode for the pixel-level masking strategy is shown in Algorithm 2. Given an LR image ILRRW×H×C, where W×H×C represents the number of channels and the spatial resolution, respectively. Using normal convolution, the feature map f with the number of channels C is obtained. Next, the random mask probability is determined by a given probability pmN(0,1). The mask operation is then carried out by traversing all the spatial pixels in f. Finally, the masked output ILRRW×H×C is generated. This pixel-level masking is applied exclusively during the training phase. The rationale is to introduce a form of stochastic perturbation, compelling the model to learn more robust and generalizable feature representations from varied and partially obscured inputs, akin to a data augmentation strategy designed to improve performance on unseen data. During inference, the model receives the original, unmasked LR input to ensure deterministic and optimal reconstruction performance by utilizing all available information:

Algorithm 2: Pixel-level masking strategy.

In the D-MNet Transformer, the decoder’s goal is to decode latent spatial variables Z0 by capitalizing on the transformer’s ability to learn long-range dependent information. While CNN-based shallow image coding is proficient at capturing local spatial information, representing global long-distance information proves challenging due to the limited receptive field (Gao et al., 2022; Liang et al., 2021; Yoo et al., 2023). To address this issue, we turn to the transformer module from the field of natural language processing as a promising solution. Recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of the transformer, particularly when equipped with the distinctive self-attention mechanism and other enhancements, in downstream vision tasks. In this work, we opt for the recently proposed recursive transformer (Gao et al., 2022) as the decoder, given its balanced performance and computational efficiency.

Our framework can be approximated using neural networks by minimizing an L1 loss function:

(6)

The objective is to minimize the expected loss function L1 over the distribution of HR images xhr and their corresponding SR images xsr, represented by the joint probability distribution P. The loss function L1 quantifies the absolute difference between the ISR and IHR using the L1-norm (denoted by ISRIHR1).

Data sets. Our model is designed for radiographic SR tasks, specifically targeting small sample training data sets that closely resemble real-world scenarios. To achieve this, we utilized 500 samples from the publicly available MURA-SR data set (Huang et al., 2022b) to train our model and compare it with other baseline methods. This data set will also be available as a benchmark for small-sample radiographic SR tasks. For evaluation purposes, we adopted the test data sets from previous research on MURA-mini and MURA-plus (Huang et al., 2022b). These two test data sets share identical ground truth, but their LR images differ due to the application of varying degradation parameters.

Metrics. For comparison with other methods, PSNR and SSIM are chosen as our evaluation metrics. All evaluations will be completed in the Y channel of the YCbCr color space.

Experimental settings. The training details parameters and the hyperparameters of the model are shown in Table 1.

During the training phase, a cropping data augmentation technique is employed. Specifically, the network receives input images that have been cropped into 48×48 patches. The learning rate is initialized at 2×104. Utilizing the PyTorch framework, the model is trained with the Adam optimizer on an NVIDIA RTX 3090 GPU. Utilizing the PyTorch framework, the model is trained with the Adam optimizer on an NVIDIA RTX 3090 GPU. Our training strategy involves two stages: we first pre-train the network using an L1 loss function to establish a stable baseline, and then fine-tune it using an MSE loss to further optimize for the PSNR metric.

For optimization, we adopt a two-stage training strategy designed to leverage the complementary strengths of different loss functions. In the first stage, we pre-train the network using the L1 loss. The L1 loss is known for its robustness to outliers and its ability to preserve sharp edges, making it ideal for the initial phase where the model learns the fundamental structural features of the radiographic images. By penalizing errors linearly, it prevents large initial prediction errors from destabilizing the training process and guides the model to a structurally sound solution.

In the second stage, we fine-tune the model using the MSE loss. After the model has learned the coarse features, the MSE loss is employed to refine the results for high-fidelity reconstruction. Because MSE Loss penalizes larger errors quadratically, it strongly encourages the minimization of all pixelwise discrepancies, which directly optimizes for the PSNR metric. This two-stage approach first establishes a robust baseline and then polishes the details, providing a clear and effective path to achieving state-of-the-art performance. The Adam optimizer is used throughout both stages with a learning rate of 2 × 10−4.

4.3.1 Quantitative results.

To evaluate the performance of the D-MNet transformer, we compared the proposed method with several benchmark methods, which also include the state-of-the-art models: SRCNN (Dong et al., 2015), FSRCNN (Dong et al., 2016), SRGAN (Ledig et al., 2017), EDSR (Lim et al., 2017), RCAN (Zhang et al., 2018), SwinIR (Liang et al., 2021), OverNet (Behjati et al., 2021), ShuffleMixer(base and tiny) (Sun et al., 2022), LBNet (Gao et al., 2022) and DiVANet (Behjati et al., 2023).

Table 2 presents a comparison of the D-MNet Transformer with 10 state-of-the-art learning-based methods. Notably, ShuffleMixer, LBNet, and DiVANet represent the most recent advancements in the field. The comparison includes not only conventional benchmarks but also an evaluation of lightweight methods. The experimental results indicate that our method achieves the best PSNR metric (30.43 and 30.82 dB) across all tested scenarios. While our SSIM scores are highly competitive (0.9509 and 0.9439 at ×4), we note that in some specific cases, other methods like SwinIR achieve marginally higher SSIM values (e.g. 0.9514 vs 0.9509 on ×4 MURA-mini). This suggests a potential trade-off between optimizing for different image quality metrics. Our model, particularly with its L1/MSE loss optimization strategy and focus on fine-grained feature separation, appears to prioritize pixelwise accuracy (measured by PSNR) over perceptual structural similarity (measured by SSIM). This trade-off is an interesting characteristic of our proposed architecture and highlights the ongoing challenge in developing a single model that universally excels across all evaluation metrics. Furthermore, competitive results are observed for the SSIM (0.9422 and 0.9333). This evidence suggests that our model is well-suited for data distribution in medical radiology image SR tasks. The effectiveness of our model is attributed to two primary factors: the D-MNet’s shallow feature representation, which respects the independence of feature channel information, and the pixel-level masking strategy that facilitates network training in the face of small sample challenges. More details will be discussed in the ablation experiments section. Next, we will show more details about the images in the qualitative result section.

4.3.2 Qualitative result.

In this section, the SR images at ×2 and ×4 upsampling factors are presented (see Figures 3 and 4). Experimental results indicate that our method excels in reconstructing edge texture information within the images, enabling the recovery of critical details, such as sharp edges, which are essential for diagnostic decisions. To facilitate a clearer understanding of edge detail recovery, Figures 5 and 6 present heat maps of the histogram of oriented gradients (HOG), visualizing the magnitude of edge gradients in the SR images. The accompanying color bar in these figures indicates the gradient strength, where colors transitioning from blue (low magnitude, ≈0) to yellow and red (high magnitude, ≈300) represent increasing edge intensity. Consequently, regions rendered in warmer colors (yellows and reds) signify stronger and more pronounced edge details. These visualizations suggest that our proposed method more effectively reconstructs fine textures and sharp edges, as evidenced by the gradient patterns and intensities in our results more closely resembling those of the HR reference compared to other methods. The utilization of HOG features for this analysis is not only effective for visualizing such edge information but also highlights their broader utility in computer vision tasks like object detection, where robust edge representation is critical.

The D-MNet Transformer incorporates two key concepts: first, it respects the independence between feature channel information when encoding shallow local features, which is accomplished through the use of DW convolution in the D-MNet architecture; second, it employs a pixel-level masking strategy between feature channels to enhance the model’s performance when dealing with small sample training data. In this section, we will present the corresponding ablation experiments.

4.4.1 Effectiveness of the D-MNet.

As shown in Table 3, we evaluated various shallow local feature extraction blocks. To establish a clear comparative context, we included several modules with relatively fundamental or representative architectures, such as the Attention Head and the standard CNN-base, which serve as basic benchmark models to help quantify the gains from more sophisticated designs. Our Shallow D-MNet (30.00 dB), which consists of three DW convolution blocks, is specifically designated as the baseline for this set of experiments. In contrast, our proposed Deep D-MNet, which demonstrates superior model performance (30.43 dB), utilizes 9 DW convolution blocks. From the results, we can observe that modules primarily based on conventional CNN structures, for instance, the Attention Head (29.91 dB, whose design might draw upon principles from approaches like (Zhang et al., 2022)) and the CNN-base module (30.06 dB), are less effective for achieving optimal results on the data distribution of medical radiological images. In contrast, our proposed Deep D-MNet, which acts as a DW convolutional head in this context, demonstrates superior model performance (30.43 dB) compared to the module constructed with standard CNNs (30.06 dB). This advantage can be attributed to the operational nature of DW convolution, where most computations are performed on independent feature channels, thereby better preserving the distinct information within each channel. Furthermore, the experiments (comparing Deep D-MNet at 30.43 dB with the baseline Shallow D-MNet at 30.00 dB) also indicate that increasing the number of DW convolution layers is beneficial for the model’s performance.

For different shallow feature extraction modules, the PSNR line plots are shown in Figure 7(a). Our method can achieve the best performance compared to other baseline methods (Transformer and CNN or Only Transformer). On the other hand, the t-SNE (Van der Maaten and Hinton, 2008) method for dimensionality reduction visualizes the relationship between the SR samples reconstructed by our method and the HR images (see Figure 7(b) and (c). Our method demonstrates a better fit to the data distribution at scaling factors: ×2 and ×4.

4.4.2 Effectiveness of the pixel-level masking strategy.

To understand the rationale behind our masking strategy, we first examine the characteristics of feature activations in radiographic images. As illustrated by the feature activation map in Figure 8(a), generated using CAM (Selvaraju et al., 2017), critical diagnostic information in radiographic images often concentrates in highly localized regions (e.g. the area highlighted by the red bounding box). Traditional block masking strategies, visualized in Figure 8(c), operate by obscuring contiguous patches of the input. If such a block were to cover a crucial localized activation area [as exemplified by comparing the potential impact of the masked region in Figure 8(c) with the active region in Figure 8(a)], important spatial information within that entire critical area could be completely lost. This coarse-grained masking can be detrimental when precise local details are paramount.

In contrast, our proposed pixel-level masking strategy, visualized in Figure 8(b), offers a more nuanced approach. While Figure 8(b) depicts the visual outcome of such a mask, the core advantage lies in its application: we apply these pixel masks independently across different feature channels. This means that even if a specific pixel is masked in one feature channel, its information might still be preserved and processed in other unmasked channels. This fine-grained, channelwise independent masking encourages the model to learn more robust and distributed representations, reducing the risk of catastrophic information loss in critical local areas compared to block masking.

Furthermore, we investigated the influence of the mask rate “pm” on the efficacy of the pixel-level masking strategy, with the results presented in Table 4. The study reveals a clear optimal value: a mask rate of pm=0.5 achieves the best performance (30.43 dB), significantly improving upon the baseline. This suggests that a 50% masking rate strikes an effective balance, providing a sufficient challenge for the model to learn robust features through reconstruction while retaining enough unmasked information for effective learning. When the rate is too high (e.g. 0.75), performance degrades, likely due to excessive information loss.

Based on this analysis, we concur that the optimal masking rate is likely a task-dependent hyperparameter. The ideal ratio may vary depending on factors such as the data set’s complexity, the degradation level (i.e. scaling factor), and the model’s capacity. Therefore, while pm=0.5 serves as a strong baseline for radiographic SR, we recommend that it be treated as a tunable hyperparameter when adapting our method to new applications or data sets to achieve the best possible performance.

In this work, we explore a new paradigm for the radiographic image SR task: D-MNet Transformer. First, the D-MNet feature extraction head enhances the representation of edges and textural details in X-ray images, being particularly sensitive to local domains and incorporating multiscale feature extraction. Furthermore, global contextual information is captured in the decoder using a transformer. We also propose a pixel-level masking strategy, which significantly enhances the performance of the D-MNet Transformer when trained with small samples, compared to the classical block masking strategy. We evaluate the model’s performance on benchmark data sets and achieve state-of-the-art results in the quantitative metric PSNR comparison.

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP25K03130.

Bachmann
,
R.
,
Mizrahi
,
D.
,
Atanov
,
A.
and
Zamir
,
A.
(
2022
), “
Multimae: multi- modal multi-task masked auto encoders
”,
Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XXXVII
, pp.
348
-
367
.
Bao
,
H.
,
Dong
,
L.
,
Piao
,
S.
and
Wei
,
F.
(
2021
), “
Beit: Bert pre-training of image transformers
”,
arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.08254
.
Behjati
,
P.
,
Rodriguez
,
P.
,
Fernández
,
C.
,
Hupont
,
I.
,
Mehri
,
A.
and
Gonzàlez
,
J.
(
2023
), “
Single image super-resolution based on directional variance attention network
”,
Pattern Recognition
, Vol.
133
, p.
108997
.
Behjati
,
P.
,
Rodriguez
,
P.
,
Mehri
,
A.
,
Hupont
,
I.
,
Tena
,
C.F.
and
Gonzalez
,
J.
(
2021
), “
Overnet: lightweight multi-scale super-resolution with over scaling network
”,
WACV
, pp.
2694
-
2703
.
Brown
,
T.
,
Mann
,
B.
,
Ryder
,
N.
,
Subbiah
,
M.
,
Kaplan
,
J.D.
,
Dhariwal
,
P.
,
Neelakantan
,
A.
,
Shyam
,
P.
,
Sastry
,
G.
,
Askell
,
A.
,
Agarwal
,
S.
,
Herbert-Voss
,
A.
,
Krueger
,
G.
,
Henighan
,
T.
,
Child
,
R.
,
Ramesh
,
A.
,
Ziegler
,
D.M.
,
Wu
,
J.
,
Winter
,
C.
,
Hesse
,
C.
,
Chen
,
M.
,
Sigler
,
E.
,
Litwin
,
M.
,
Gray
,
S.
,
Chess
,
B.
,
Clark
,
J.
,
Berner
,
C.
,
McCandlish
,
S.
,
Radford
,
A.
,
Sutskever
,
I.
and
Amodei
,
D.
(
2020
), “
Language models are few-shot learners
”,
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
, Vol.
33
, pp.
1877
-
1901
.
Chen
,
H.
,
He
,
X.
,
Qing
,
L.
,
Wu
,
Y.
,
Ren
,
C.
,
Sheriff
,
R.E.
and
Zhu
,
C.
(
2022
), “
Real-world single image super-resolution: a brief review
”,
Information Fusion
, Vol.
79
, pp.
124
-
145
.
Chen
,
J.
,
Kao
,
S.H.
,
He
,
H.
,
Zhuo
,
W.
,
Wen
,
S.
,
Lee
,
C.H.
and
Chan
,
S.H.G.
(
2023
), “
Run, don’t walk: chasing higher FLOPS for faster neural networks
”,
arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.03667
.
Chi
,
J.
,
Sun
,
Z.
,
Meng
,
L.
,
Wang
,
S.
,
Yu
,
X.
,
Wei
,
X.
and
Yang
,
B.
(
2024
), “
Low-dose CT image super-resolution with noise suppression based on prior degradation estimator and self-guidance mechanism
”,
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
, Vol.
44
No.
2
.
Chollet
,
F.
(
2017
), “
Xception: deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions
”,
Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
, pp.
1251
-
1258
.
Dong
,
C.
,
Loy
,
C.C.
and
Tang
,
X.
(
2016
), “
Accelerating the super-resolution convolutional neural network
”,
ECCV 2016
, pp.
391
-
407
.
Dong
,
C.
,
Loy
,
C.C.
,
He
,
K.
and
Tang
,
X.
(
2015
), “
Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks
”,
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
, Vol.
38
No.
2
, pp.
295
-
307
.
Dong
,
X.
,
Bao
,
J.
,
Zhang
,
T.
,
Chen
,
D.
,
Zhang
,
W.
,
Yuan
,
L.
,
Chen
,
D.
,
Wen
,
F.
and
Yu
,
N.
(
2022
), “
Bootstrapped masked auto encoders for vision BERT pretraining
”,
Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XXX
, pp.
247
-
264
.
Gao
,
G.
,
Wang
,
Z.
,
Li
,
J.
,
Li
,
W.
,
Yu
,
Y.
and
Zeng
,
T.
(
2022
)“
Lightweight bi-modal network for single-image super-resolution via symmetric CNN and recursive transformer
”,
arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.13286
.
He
,
K.
,
Gkioxari
,
G.
,
Dollár
,
P.
and
Girshick
,
R.
(
2017
), “
Mask R-CNN
”,
Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision
, pp.
2961
-
2969
.
He
,
K.
,
Chen
,
X.
,
Xie
,
S.
,
Li
,
Y.
,
Dollár
,
P.
and
Girshick
,
R.
(
2022
), “
Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners
”,
Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
, pp.
16000
-
16009
.
Hou
,
H.
,
Jin
,
Q.
,
Zhang
,
G.
and
Li
,
Z.
(
2022
), “
CT image quality enhancement via a dual-channel neural network with jointing denoising and super-resolution
”,
Neurocomputing
, Vol.
492
, pp.
343
-
352
.
Huang
,
Y.
,
Wang
,
Q.
and
Omachi
,
S.
(
2022b
), “
Rethinking degradation: radio-graph super-resolution via AID-SRGAN
”,
Machine Learning in Medical Imaging: 13th International Workshop, MLMI 2022, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2022, Proceedings
, pp.
43
-
52
.
Huang
,
Y.
, et al. (
2022a
), “
Infrared image super-resolution: systematic review, and future trends
”,
arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.12322
.
Huang
,
Y.
,
Jiang
,
Z.
,
Lan
,
R.
,
Zhang
,
S.
and
Pi
,
K.
(
2021
), “
Infrared image super-resolution via transfer learning and PSRGAN
”,
IEEE Signal Processing Letters
, Vol.
28
, pp.
982
-
986
.
Ledig
,
C.
,
Theis
,
L.
,
Huszár
,
F.
,
Caballero
,
J.
,
Cunningham
,
A.
and
Acosta
,
A.
(
2017
), “
Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network
”,
Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
, pp.
4681
-
4690
.
Lee
,
B.
,
Ko
,
K.
,
Hong
,
J.
and
Ko
,
H.
(
2023
), “
Domain-agnostic single-image super-resolution via a meta-transfer neural architecture search
”,
Neurocomputing
, Vol.
524
, pp.
59
-
68
.
Li
,
H.
,
Yang
,
Y.
,
Chang
,
M.
,
Chen
,
S.
,
Feng
,
H.
,
Xu
,
Z.
,
Li
,
Q.
and
Chen
,
Y.
(
2022
), “
Srdiff: single image super-resolution with diffusion probabilistic models
”,
Neurocomputing
, Vol.
479
, pp.
47
-
59
.
Liang
,
J.
,
Cao
,
J.
,
Sun
,
G.
,
Zhang
,
K.
,
Van Gool
,
L.
and
Timofte
,
R.
(
2021
), “
Swinir: image restoration using swin transformer
”,
Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision
, pp.
1833
-
1844
.
Lim
,
B.
,
Son
,
S.
,
Kim
,
H.
,
Nah
,
S.
and
Lee
,
K.M.
(
2017
), “
Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution
”,
Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
, pp.
136
-
144
.
Liu
,
A.
,
Liu
,
Y.
,
Gu
,
J.
,
Qiao
,
Y.
and
Dong
,
C.
(
2022
), “
Blind image super-resolution: a survey and beyond
”,
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
.
Nagayama
,
Y.
,
Ishiuchi
,
S.
,
Inoue
,
T.
,
Funama
,
Y.
,
Shigematsu
,
S.
,
Emoto
,
T.
,
Sakabe
,
D.
,
Ueda
,
H.
,
Chiba
,
Y.
,
Ito
,
Y.
,
Kidoh
,
M.
,
Oda
,
S.
,
Nakaura
,
T.
and
Hirai
,
T.
(
2025
), “
Super-resolution deep-learning reconstruction with 1024 matrix improves CT image quality for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma assessment
”,
European Journal of Radiology
, Vol.
184
, p.
111953
.
Radford
,
A.
,
Narasimhan
,
K.
,
Salimans
,
T.
,
Sutskever
,
I.
, et al. (
2018
), “
Improving language understanding by generative pre-training
”.
Radford
,
A.
,
Wu
,
J.
,
Child
,
R.
,
Luan
,
D.
,
Amodei
,
D.
and
Sutskever
,
I.
(
2019
), “
Language models are unsupervised multitask learners
”,
OpenAI Blog
, Vol.
1
No.
8
, p.
9
.
Selvaraju
,
R.R.
,
Cogswell
,
M.
,
Das
,
A.
,
Vedantam
,
R.
,
Parikh
,
D.
and
Batra
,
D.
(
2017
), “
Grad-cam: visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization
”,
Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision
, pp.
618
-
626
.
Suárez
,
P.L.
,
Carpio
,
D.
and
Sappa
,
A.D.
(
2023
), “
Enhancement of guided thermal image super-resolution approaches
”,
Neurocomputing
, Vol.
573
, p.
127197
.
Sun
,
L.
,
Pan
,
J.
and
Tang
,
J.
(
2022
), “
ShuffleMixer: an efficient ConvNet for image super-resolution
”,
arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.15175
.
Van der Maaten
,
L.
and
Hinton
,
G.
(
2008
), “
Visualizing data using t-SNE
”,
Journal of Machine Learning Research
, Vol.
9
No.
11
.
Wang
,
Z.
,
Chen
,
J.
and
Hoi
,
S.C.
(
2020
), “
Deep learning for image super-resolution: a survey
”,
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
, Vol.
43
No.
10
, pp.
3365
-
3387
.
Wang
,
X.
,
Xie
,
L.
,
Dong
,
C.
and
Shan
,
Y.
(
2021a
), “
Real-ESRGAN: training real-world blind super-resolution with pure synthetic data
”,
Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision
, pp.
1905
-
1914
.
Wang
,
Z.
,
Lu
,
Y.
,
Li
,
W.
,
Wang
,
S.
,
Wang
,
X.
and
Chen
,
X.
(
2021b
), “
Single image super-resolution with attention-based densely connected module
”,
Neurocomputing
, Vol.
453
, pp.
876
-
884
.
Wang
,
H.
,
Song
,
K.
,
Fan
,
J.
,
Wang
,
Y.
,
Xie
,
J.
and
Zhang
,
Z.
(
2023
), “
Hard patches mining for masked image modeling
”,
arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05919
.
Wang
,
X.
,
Yu
,
K.
,
Wu
,
S.
,
Gu
,
J.
,
Liu
,
Y.
,
Dong
,
C.
,
Qiao
,
Y.
and
Loy
,
C.C.
(
2018
), “
ESRGAN: enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks
”,
Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops
.
Xie
,
J.
,
Gong
,
L.
,
Shao
,
S.
,
Lin
,
S.
and
Luo
,
L.
(
2023
), “
Hybrid knowledge distillation from intermediate layers for efficient single image super-resolution
”,
Neurocomputing
, Vol.
554
, p.
126592
.
Yoo
,
J.
,
Kim
,
T.
,
Lee
,
S.
,
Kim
,
S.H.
,
Lee
,
H.
and
Kim
,
T.H.
(
2023
), “
Enriched CNN-transformer feature aggregation networks for super-resolution
”,
Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)
.
Yu
,
B.
,
Ozdemir
,
S.
,
Dong
,
Y.
,
Shao
,
W.
,
Shi
,
K.
and
Gong
,
K.
(
2024
), “
Pet image denoising based on 3D denoising diffusion probabilistic model: evaluations on total-body datasets
”,
International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention
, pp.
541
-
550
.
Yu
,
W.
,
Li
,
Z.
,
Liu
,
Q.
,
Jiang
,
F.
,
Guo
,
C.
and
Zhang
,
S.
(
2023
), “
Scale-aware frequency attention network for super-resolution
”,
Neurocomputing
, Vol.
554
, p.
126584
.
Yu
,
B.
,
Ozdemir
,
S.
,
Dong
,
Y.
,
Shao
,
W.
,
Pan
,
T.
,
Shi
,
K.
and
Gong
,
K.
(
2025
), “
Robust whole-body PET image denoising using 3D diffusion models: evaluation across various scanners, tracers, and dose levels
”,
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
, Vol.
52
No.
7
, pp.
2549
-
2562
.
Zhang
,
X.
,
Zeng
,
H.
,
Guo
,
S.
and
Zhang
,
L.
(
2022
), “
Efficient long-range attention network for image super-resolution
”,
Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XVII
, pp.
649
-
667
.
Zhang
,
Y.
,
Li
,
K.
,
Li
,
K.
,
Wang
,
L.
,
Zhong
,
B.
and
Fu
,
Y.
(
2018
), “
Image super-resolution using very deep residual channel attention networks
”,
ECCV
, pp.
286
-
301
.
Zhong
,
Z.
,
Zheng
,
L.
,
Kang
,
G.
,
Li
,
S.
and
Yang
,
Y.
(
2020
), “
Random erasing data augmentation
”,
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
, Vol.
34
, No.
7
, pp.
13001
-
13008
.
Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at Link to the terms of the CC BY 4.0 licenceLink to the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license.

Data & Figures

Figure 1.
A super-resolution framework shows shallow local feature encoding, D M Net processing, transformer blocks and pixel shuffle to produce I S R from I L R.The diagram shows shallow local feature encoding and reconstruction for super-resolution. I L R passes through convolution and splits into two branches labelled shallow local feature encoding, ours and shallow local feature encoding, others. In the upper branch, f passes through M p, D M Net and feature domain to produce Z 0 belongs to D 1. In the lower branch, f passes through others and feature domain to produce Z i belongs to D 2. A transformer D is shown with optimisation strategy defined as theta prime equals a r g min over theta in Theta of expectation over x h r, x s r in P L of double vertical line I S R minus I H R vertical line 1. In the main pipeline, I L R passes through convolution to channel feature map. Pixel mask M p produces I L R prime. D M Net with theta D and theta E processes features with n 36 arrow n 64 arrow ellipsis arrow n 1024 arrow n 512 arrow ellipsis arrow n 64. Features are combined by plus operations, then pass through transformer blocks and pixel shuffle, and produce I S R. The legend lists convolution, D W convolution, D W block, transformer, pixel shuffle, channel feature map, skip connection, and n 36 channel.

An overview of the proposed D-MNet transformer. Our method comprises shallow feature encoders, D-MNet and transformer-based decoders. The D-MNet components utilize depthwise convolution, which uses varying feature channels n (ranging from 32 to 1024) to achieve feature extraction. The encoded output Z0D1 is then used as input for the transformer decoder D. Mp represents the pixel-level masking strategy, ILR denotes the LR image, and ILR signifies the masked output. The B indicates the bicubic upsampling operation, and the final output ISR corresponds to the SR image. Best viewed in color

Figure 1.
A super-resolution framework shows shallow local feature encoding, D M Net processing, transformer blocks and pixel shuffle to produce I S R from I L R.The diagram shows shallow local feature encoding and reconstruction for super-resolution. I L R passes through convolution and splits into two branches labelled shallow local feature encoding, ours and shallow local feature encoding, others. In the upper branch, f passes through M p, D M Net and feature domain to produce Z 0 belongs to D 1. In the lower branch, f passes through others and feature domain to produce Z i belongs to D 2. A transformer D is shown with optimisation strategy defined as theta prime equals a r g min over theta in Theta of expectation over x h r, x s r in P L of double vertical line I S R minus I H R vertical line 1. In the main pipeline, I L R passes through convolution to channel feature map. Pixel mask M p produces I L R prime. D M Net with theta D and theta E processes features with n 36 arrow n 64 arrow ellipsis arrow n 1024 arrow n 512 arrow ellipsis arrow n 64. Features are combined by plus operations, then pass through transformer blocks and pixel shuffle, and produce I S R. The legend lists convolution, D W convolution, D W block, transformer, pixel shuffle, channel feature map, skip connection, and n 36 channel.

An overview of the proposed D-MNet transformer. Our method comprises shallow feature encoders, D-MNet and transformer-based decoders. The D-MNet components utilize depthwise convolution, which uses varying feature channels n (ranging from 32 to 1024) to achieve feature extraction. The encoded output Z0D1 is then used as input for the transformer decoder D. Mp represents the pixel-level masking strategy, ILR denotes the LR image, and ILR signifies the masked output. The B indicates the bicubic upsampling operation, and the final output ISR corresponds to the SR image. Best viewed in color

Close modal
Figure 2.
A D M Net architecture presents theta D encoder and theta E decoder blocks with depthwise separable convolution 2 d and convolution transpose 2 d layers and skip sum output.D M Net is enclosed within a dashed boundary and is divided into theta D and theta E sections. The theta D section functions as an encoder and contains sequential depthwise separable convolution 2 d layers with dimensions 36 by 64, 64 by 128, 128 by 256, 256 by 512, 512 by 1024, 1024 by 512, 512 by 256, 256 by 128, and 128 by 64. The theta E section functions as a decoder and contains alternating depthwise separable convolution 2 d and convolution transpose 2 d layers with dimensions 64 by 128, 128 by 64, 64 by 256, 256 by 128, 128 by 512, 512 by 256, 256 by 256, 256 by 128, 128 by 64, and 64 by 36. A skip connection links the input to a plus operation at the output, where features are summed to produce the final result.

The detailed architecture of the D-MNet module. The module is composed of a sub-encoder (θD) and a sub-decoder (θE). The sub-encoder utilizes a sequence of depthwise separable convolution blocks to create a multiscale feature representation, progressively expanding the channel dimension from 36- to a 1024-dimensional bottleneck. The sub-decoder then uses a combination of depthwise separable convolutions and convolution transpose layers to reconstruct the features. A global skip connection sums the module’s output with its input, enabling the network to learn the residual mapping

Figure 2.
A D M Net architecture presents theta D encoder and theta E decoder blocks with depthwise separable convolution 2 d and convolution transpose 2 d layers and skip sum output.D M Net is enclosed within a dashed boundary and is divided into theta D and theta E sections. The theta D section functions as an encoder and contains sequential depthwise separable convolution 2 d layers with dimensions 36 by 64, 64 by 128, 128 by 256, 256 by 512, 512 by 1024, 1024 by 512, 512 by 256, 256 by 128, and 128 by 64. The theta E section functions as a decoder and contains alternating depthwise separable convolution 2 d and convolution transpose 2 d layers with dimensions 64 by 128, 128 by 64, 64 by 256, 256 by 128, 128 by 512, 512 by 256, 256 by 256, 256 by 128, 128 by 64, and 64 by 36. A skip connection links the input to a plus operation at the output, where features are summed to produce the final result.

The detailed architecture of the D-MNet module. The module is composed of a sub-encoder (θD) and a sub-decoder (θE). The sub-encoder utilizes a sequence of depthwise separable convolution blocks to create a multiscale feature representation, progressively expanding the channel dimension from 36- to a 1024-dimensional bottleneck. The sub-decoder then uses a combination of depthwise separable convolutions and convolution transpose layers to reconstruct the features. A global skip connection sums the module’s output with its input, enabling the network to learn the residual mapping

Close modal
Figure 3.
A comparison grid shows elbow X ray reference images and super-resolution results from S R C N N, F S R C N N, S R G A N, E D S R, R C A N, Swin I R, Over Net, S Mixer, L B Net, D i V A Net and Ours.Two reference elbow X ray images are shown on the left labelled Reference M U R A mini H R Number 0013 and Reference M U R A plus H R Number 0050. Each reference image contains a rectangular region marking the area of interest. To the right of each reference image, cropped super-resolution results of the same region are arranged in rows. The methods listed are S R C N N, F S R C N N, S R G A N, E D S R, R C A N, Swin I R, Over Net, S Mixer b, S Mixer t, L B Net, D i V A Net, and Ours. Each method presents a reconstructed elbow joint region corresponding to the highlighted crop. The grid allows direct visual comparison of structural details across methods for both M U R A mini and M U R A plus high-resolution cases.

Visual comparisons for ×2SR on MURA-mini and MURA-mini. The sample No. 0013 from MURA-plus is picked in the first row. The sample No. 0050 in the second row is from MURA-plus

Figure 3.
A comparison grid shows elbow X ray reference images and super-resolution results from S R C N N, F S R C N N, S R G A N, E D S R, R C A N, Swin I R, Over Net, S Mixer, L B Net, D i V A Net and Ours.Two reference elbow X ray images are shown on the left labelled Reference M U R A mini H R Number 0013 and Reference M U R A plus H R Number 0050. Each reference image contains a rectangular region marking the area of interest. To the right of each reference image, cropped super-resolution results of the same region are arranged in rows. The methods listed are S R C N N, F S R C N N, S R G A N, E D S R, R C A N, Swin I R, Over Net, S Mixer b, S Mixer t, L B Net, D i V A Net, and Ours. Each method presents a reconstructed elbow joint region corresponding to the highlighted crop. The grid allows direct visual comparison of structural details across methods for both M U R A mini and M U R A plus high-resolution cases.

Visual comparisons for ×2SR on MURA-mini and MURA-mini. The sample No. 0013 from MURA-plus is picked in the first row. The sample No. 0050 in the second row is from MURA-plus

Close modal
Figure 4.
A two-case elbow X ray comparison shows cropped reconstruction results across 12 super-resolution methods against reference high-resolution images.Two reference elbow X ray images are shown on the left labelled Reference M U R A mini H R Number 0002 and Reference M U R A plus H R Number 0026. Each reference image contains a rectangular region marking the area of interest. To the right of each reference image, cropped super-resolution results of the same region are arranged in rows. The methods listed are S R C N N, F S R C N N, S R G A N, E D S R, R C A N, Swin I R, Over Net, S Mixer b, S Mixer t, L B Net, D i V A Net, and Ours. Each method presents a reconstructed elbow joint region corresponding to the highlighted crop. The grid enables direct visual comparison of structural detail across methods for both M U R A mini and M U R A plus high-resolution cases.

Visual comparisons for ×4SR on MURA-mini and MURA-plus. The sample No. 0002 from MURA-mini is picked in the first row. The sample No. 0026 in the second row is from MURA-plus

Figure 4.
A two-case elbow X ray comparison shows cropped reconstruction results across 12 super-resolution methods against reference high-resolution images.Two reference elbow X ray images are shown on the left labelled Reference M U R A mini H R Number 0002 and Reference M U R A plus H R Number 0026. Each reference image contains a rectangular region marking the area of interest. To the right of each reference image, cropped super-resolution results of the same region are arranged in rows. The methods listed are S R C N N, F S R C N N, S R G A N, E D S R, R C A N, Swin I R, Over Net, S Mixer b, S Mixer t, L B Net, D i V A Net, and Ours. Each method presents a reconstructed elbow joint region corresponding to the highlighted crop. The grid enables direct visual comparison of structural detail across methods for both M U R A mini and M U R A plus high-resolution cases.

Visual comparisons for ×4SR on MURA-mini and MURA-plus. The sample No. 0002 from MURA-mini is picked in the first row. The sample No. 0026 in the second row is from MURA-plus

Close modal
Figure 5.
A comparison shows Reference H R Number 0065 with D i V A Net, S Mixer t and Ours, plus corresponding gradient maps.Four elbow X ray images are shown in the top row labelled Reference H R 0065, D i V A Net, S Mixer t, and Ours. Each image displays the same rotated elbow joint region. The lower row shows corresponding gradient maps labelled H R Gradient, D i V A Net Gradient, S Mixer Gradient, and Ours Gradient. Each gradient image presents edge intensity patterns of the same region. A vertical scale bar is shown at the right of the gradient row with values 0, 100, 200, and 300.

Histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) as a visualization feature to display the edge gradient information of the SR images. We presented 0065 samples with an ×4 upsampling factor, incorporating DiVANet and ShuffleMixer (tiny) as benchmark comparisons

Figure 5.
A comparison shows Reference H R Number 0065 with D i V A Net, S Mixer t and Ours, plus corresponding gradient maps.Four elbow X ray images are shown in the top row labelled Reference H R 0065, D i V A Net, S Mixer t, and Ours. Each image displays the same rotated elbow joint region. The lower row shows corresponding gradient maps labelled H R Gradient, D i V A Net Gradient, S Mixer Gradient, and Ours Gradient. Each gradient image presents edge intensity patterns of the same region. A vertical scale bar is shown at the right of the gradient row with values 0, 100, 200, and 300.

Histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) as a visualization feature to display the edge gradient information of the SR images. We presented 0065 samples with an ×4 upsampling factor, incorporating DiVANet and ShuffleMixer (tiny) as benchmark comparisons

Close modal
Figure 6.
A comparison shows Reference H R 0060 with D i V A Net, S Mixer t and Ours reconstructions and corresponding gradient maps.Four elbow X ray images are shown in the top row labelled Reference H R 0060, D i V A Net, S Mixer t, and Ours. Each image displays the same elbow joint region in a similar rotated orientation. The bottom row shows gradient maps labelled H R Gradient, D i V A Net Gradient, S Mixer Gradient, and Ours Gradient. Each gradient map represents edge intensity patterns of the corresponding top image. A vertical scale bar appears at the right of the gradient row with values 0, 100, 200, and 300.

Histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) as a visualization feature to display the edge gradient information of the SR images. We presented 0060 samples with an ×2 upsampling factor, incorporating DiVANet and ShuffleMixer (tiny) as benchmark comparisons. Best viewed in color

Figure 6.
A comparison shows Reference H R 0060 with D i V A Net, S Mixer t and Ours reconstructions and corresponding gradient maps.Four elbow X ray images are shown in the top row labelled Reference H R 0060, D i V A Net, S Mixer t, and Ours. Each image displays the same elbow joint region in a similar rotated orientation. The bottom row shows gradient maps labelled H R Gradient, D i V A Net Gradient, S Mixer Gradient, and Ours Gradient. Each gradient map represents edge intensity patterns of the corresponding top image. A vertical scale bar appears at the right of the gradient row with values 0, 100, 200, and 300.

Histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) as a visualization feature to display the edge gradient information of the SR images. We presented 0060 samples with an ×2 upsampling factor, incorporating DiVANet and ShuffleMixer (tiny) as benchmark comparisons. Best viewed in color

Close modal
Figure 7.
Three plots show P S N R versus epoch and two scatter comparisons of H R with Ours on M U R A mini x 4 and x 2.Panel A is a line chart with vertical axis labelled P S N R per decibel and horizontal axis labelled Epoch from 100 to 700. Three curves are shown. Ours increases from about 30.25 to about 30.42. Transformer and C N N increases from about 29.78 to about 30.17. Only Transformer increases from about 29.15 to about 29.64. Panel B is a scatter plot comparing H R and Ours M U R A mini x 4. Most points cluster around x between 0.1 and 0.3 and y between 0.45 and 0.6. A smaller group appears around x between 0.25 and 0.4 and y between 0.1 and 0.35. A few points lie near x above 0.8 and y above 0.75. Panel C is a scatter plot comparing H R and Ours M U R A mini x 2. Most points cluster around x between 0.1 and 0.3 and y between 0.45 and 0.6. A secondary cluster appears around x between 0.25 and 0.4 and y between 0.1 and 0.35. A few points are located near x above 0.8 and y above 0.75. Legends identify H R and Ours in both scatter plots.

From left to right: (a) PSNR performance with different backbone networks on the MURA-mini data set at ×4 scaling factor. (b) Visualization of results by t-SNE on our method and HR samples (×4). (c) Visualization results by t-SNE in our method and HR samples (×2)

Figure 7.
Three plots show P S N R versus epoch and two scatter comparisons of H R with Ours on M U R A mini x 4 and x 2.Panel A is a line chart with vertical axis labelled P S N R per decibel and horizontal axis labelled Epoch from 100 to 700. Three curves are shown. Ours increases from about 30.25 to about 30.42. Transformer and C N N increases from about 29.78 to about 30.17. Only Transformer increases from about 29.15 to about 29.64. Panel B is a scatter plot comparing H R and Ours M U R A mini x 4. Most points cluster around x between 0.1 and 0.3 and y between 0.45 and 0.6. A smaller group appears around x between 0.25 and 0.4 and y between 0.1 and 0.35. A few points lie near x above 0.8 and y above 0.75. Panel C is a scatter plot comparing H R and Ours M U R A mini x 2. Most points cluster around x between 0.1 and 0.3 and y between 0.45 and 0.6. A secondary cluster appears around x between 0.25 and 0.4 and y between 0.1 and 0.35. A few points are located near x above 0.8 and y above 0.75. Legends identify H R and Ours in both scatter plots.

From left to right: (a) PSNR performance with different backbone networks on the MURA-mini data set at ×4 scaling factor. (b) Visualization of results by t-SNE on our method and HR samples (×4). (c) Visualization results by t-SNE in our method and HR samples (×2)

Close modal
Figure 8.
Four panels show a pixel mask heatmap, noise map, block mask map and P S N R versus epoch comparison.Panel A shows a pixel mask intensity map over an elbow X ray region with a rectangular box marking an area of interest. Panel B shows a noise like map with dense speckled patterns across the image and a rectangular box at the lower right corner marking a selected region. Panel C shows a block mask composed of square patches with varying intensities and a rectangular box at the lower right highlighting a selected block region. Panel D is a line chart with vertical axis labelled P S N R per decibel and horizontal axis labelled Epoch. Two curves are shown for Pixel Mask and Block Mask. The Pixel Mask curve increases from about 29.2 to about 30.1. The Block Mask curve increases from about 28.4 to about 29.25. An annotation indicates a difference of 0.79 decibel near the final epoch.

From left to right: (a) heat map visualization of radiographic images by CAM (Selvaraju et al., 2017). (b) Pixel-level masking strategy visualization. (c) Block mask strategy visualization. (d) PSNR evaluation for different masking strategy performance (×4 and MUR-mini). Best viewed in color

Figure 8.
Four panels show a pixel mask heatmap, noise map, block mask map and P S N R versus epoch comparison.Panel A shows a pixel mask intensity map over an elbow X ray region with a rectangular box marking an area of interest. Panel B shows a noise like map with dense speckled patterns across the image and a rectangular box at the lower right corner marking a selected region. Panel C shows a block mask composed of square patches with varying intensities and a rectangular box at the lower right highlighting a selected block region. Panel D is a line chart with vertical axis labelled P S N R per decibel and horizontal axis labelled Epoch. Two curves are shown for Pixel Mask and Block Mask. The Pixel Mask curve increases from about 29.2 to about 30.1. The Block Mask curve increases from about 28.4 to about 29.25. An annotation indicates a difference of 0.79 decibel near the final epoch.

From left to right: (a) heat map visualization of radiographic images by CAM (Selvaraju et al., 2017). (b) Pixel-level masking strategy visualization. (c) Block mask strategy visualization. (d) PSNR evaluation for different masking strategy performance (×4 and MUR-mini). Best viewed in color

Close modal
Table 1.

Pixel-level masked D-MNet transformer setting

Training setupModel parameters
Seed1LossL1 and MSE
Patch size96Self-attention heads8
Epochs1000OptimizationAdam
Learning rate2 × 10−4D-MNet layer9
Table 2.

Evaluations across benchmark data sets for efficient SR networks are presented. All results are computed on the Y-channel. The top and second-best performances (PSNR/dB&SSIM) are denoted in red and blue colors, respectively

MethodsScale ×4Scale ×2
MURA-miniMURA-plusMURA-miniMURA-plus
Bicubic26.48/0.936226.80/0.931427.60/0.940527.66/0.9324
SRCNN (Dong et al., 2015) (TPAMI 2015)28.86/0.942628.99/0.937530.17/0.943330.48/0.9347
FSRCNN (Dong et al., 2016) (ECCV 2016)29.98/0.950830.22/0.943731.30/0.943431.97/0.9338
SRGAN (Ledig et al., 2017) (CVPR 2017)30.37/0.951130.68/0.944031.50/0.942332.17/0.9329
EDSR (Lim et al., 2017) (CVPRW 2017)30.29/0.950930.63/0.944031.51/0.943032.17/0.9339
RCAN (Zhang et al., 2018) (ECCV 2018)29.70/0.949329.89/0.942231.32/0.942532.01/0.9329
SwinIR (Liang et al., 2021) (ICCVW 2021)30.28/0.951430.60/0.944331.55/0.943332.17/0.9341
OverNet (Behjati et al., 2021) (WACV 2021)30.02/0.950330.22/0.943229.87/0.943931.82/0.9358
ShuffleMixer(base) (Sun et al., 2022) (NeurIPS 2022)29.88/0.949130.10/0.942531.35/0.942132.00/0.9327
ShuffleMixer(tiny) (Sun et al., 2022) (NeurIPS 2022)30.09/0.950630.35/0.943431.27/0.944231.84/0.9356
LBNet (Gao et al., 2022) (IJCAI 2022)30.34/0.950030.75/0.943131.50/0.940531.99/0.9310
DiVANet (Behjati et al., 2023) (PR 2023)30.39/0.951130.72/0.943931.32/0.941531.82/0.9320
Ours30.43/0.950930.82/0.943931.56/0.942232.18/0.9333
Table 3.

Ablation studies of the D-MNet and the shallow local feature extraction block on ×4 MURA-mini test data set

ScaleMethods + DecoderPSNR/dB
Attention Head29.91
CNN-base30.06
Shallow D-MNet30.00Baseline
× 4Deep D-MNet30.430.43 dB
Table 4.

Ablation studies of the mask rate pm for pixel-level masking strategy (×4 MURA-mini test data set)

ScaleMethodsMask ratePSNR/dB
× 4Deep DWMAE + Decoder0.330.24Baseline
0.530.430.19 dB
0.7530.16
0.830.250.01 dB

Supplements

References

Bachmann
,
R.
,
Mizrahi
,
D.
,
Atanov
,
A.
and
Zamir
,
A.
(
2022
), “
Multimae: multi- modal multi-task masked auto encoders
”,
Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XXXVII
, pp.
348
-
367
.
Bao
,
H.
,
Dong
,
L.
,
Piao
,
S.
and
Wei
,
F.
(
2021
), “
Beit: Bert pre-training of image transformers
”,
arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.08254
.
Behjati
,
P.
,
Rodriguez
,
P.
,
Fernández
,
C.
,
Hupont
,
I.
,
Mehri
,
A.
and
Gonzàlez
,
J.
(
2023
), “
Single image super-resolution based on directional variance attention network
”,
Pattern Recognition
, Vol.
133
, p.
108997
.
Behjati
,
P.
,
Rodriguez
,
P.
,
Mehri
,
A.
,
Hupont
,
I.
,
Tena
,
C.F.
and
Gonzalez
,
J.
(
2021
), “
Overnet: lightweight multi-scale super-resolution with over scaling network
”,
WACV
, pp.
2694
-
2703
.
Brown
,
T.
,
Mann
,
B.
,
Ryder
,
N.
,
Subbiah
,
M.
,
Kaplan
,
J.D.
,
Dhariwal
,
P.
,
Neelakantan
,
A.
,
Shyam
,
P.
,
Sastry
,
G.
,
Askell
,
A.
,
Agarwal
,
S.
,
Herbert-Voss
,
A.
,
Krueger
,
G.
,
Henighan
,
T.
,
Child
,
R.
,
Ramesh
,
A.
,
Ziegler
,
D.M.
,
Wu
,
J.
,
Winter
,
C.
,
Hesse
,
C.
,
Chen
,
M.
,
Sigler
,
E.
,
Litwin
,
M.
,
Gray
,
S.
,
Chess
,
B.
,
Clark
,
J.
,
Berner
,
C.
,
McCandlish
,
S.
,
Radford
,
A.
,
Sutskever
,
I.
and
Amodei
,
D.
(
2020
), “
Language models are few-shot learners
”,
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
, Vol.
33
, pp.
1877
-
1901
.
Chen
,
H.
,
He
,
X.
,
Qing
,
L.
,
Wu
,
Y.
,
Ren
,
C.
,
Sheriff
,
R.E.
and
Zhu
,
C.
(
2022
), “
Real-world single image super-resolution: a brief review
”,
Information Fusion
, Vol.
79
, pp.
124
-
145
.
Chen
,
J.
,
Kao
,
S.H.
,
He
,
H.
,
Zhuo
,
W.
,
Wen
,
S.
,
Lee
,
C.H.
and
Chan
,
S.H.G.
(
2023
), “
Run, don’t walk: chasing higher FLOPS for faster neural networks
”,
arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.03667
.
Chi
,
J.
,
Sun
,
Z.
,
Meng
,
L.
,
Wang
,
S.
,
Yu
,
X.
,
Wei
,
X.
and
Yang
,
B.
(
2024
), “
Low-dose CT image super-resolution with noise suppression based on prior degradation estimator and self-guidance mechanism
”,
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
, Vol.
44
No.
2
.
Chollet
,
F.
(
2017
), “
Xception: deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions
”,
Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
, pp.
1251
-
1258
.
Dong
,
C.
,
Loy
,
C.C.
and
Tang
,
X.
(
2016
), “
Accelerating the super-resolution convolutional neural network
”,
ECCV 2016
, pp.
391
-
407
.
Dong
,
C.
,
Loy
,
C.C.
,
He
,
K.
and
Tang
,
X.
(
2015
), “
Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks
”,
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
, Vol.
38
No.
2
, pp.
295
-
307
.
Dong
,
X.
,
Bao
,
J.
,
Zhang
,
T.
,
Chen
,
D.
,
Zhang
,
W.
,
Yuan
,
L.
,
Chen
,
D.
,
Wen
,
F.
and
Yu
,
N.
(
2022
), “
Bootstrapped masked auto encoders for vision BERT pretraining
”,
Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XXX
, pp.
247
-
264
.
Gao
,
G.
,
Wang
,
Z.
,
Li
,
J.
,
Li
,
W.
,
Yu
,
Y.
and
Zeng
,
T.
(
2022
)“
Lightweight bi-modal network for single-image super-resolution via symmetric CNN and recursive transformer
”,
arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.13286
.
He
,
K.
,
Gkioxari
,
G.
,
Dollár
,
P.
and
Girshick
,
R.
(
2017
), “
Mask R-CNN
”,
Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision
, pp.
2961
-
2969
.
He
,
K.
,
Chen
,
X.
,
Xie
,
S.
,
Li
,
Y.
,
Dollár
,
P.
and
Girshick
,
R.
(
2022
), “
Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners
”,
Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
, pp.
16000
-
16009
.
Hou
,
H.
,
Jin
,
Q.
,
Zhang
,
G.
and
Li
,
Z.
(
2022
), “
CT image quality enhancement via a dual-channel neural network with jointing denoising and super-resolution
”,
Neurocomputing
, Vol.
492
, pp.
343
-
352
.
Huang
,
Y.
,
Wang
,
Q.
and
Omachi
,
S.
(
2022b
), “
Rethinking degradation: radio-graph super-resolution via AID-SRGAN
”,
Machine Learning in Medical Imaging: 13th International Workshop, MLMI 2022, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2022, Proceedings
, pp.
43
-
52
.
Huang
,
Y.
, et al. (
2022a
), “
Infrared image super-resolution: systematic review, and future trends
”,
arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.12322
.
Huang
,
Y.
,
Jiang
,
Z.
,
Lan
,
R.
,
Zhang
,
S.
and
Pi
,
K.
(
2021
), “
Infrared image super-resolution via transfer learning and PSRGAN
”,
IEEE Signal Processing Letters
, Vol.
28
, pp.
982
-
986
.
Ledig
,
C.
,
Theis
,
L.
,
Huszár
,
F.
,
Caballero
,
J.
,
Cunningham
,
A.
and
Acosta
,
A.
(
2017
), “
Photo-realistic single image super-resolution using a generative adversarial network
”,
Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
, pp.
4681
-
4690
.
Lee
,
B.
,
Ko
,
K.
,
Hong
,
J.
and
Ko
,
H.
(
2023
), “
Domain-agnostic single-image super-resolution via a meta-transfer neural architecture search
”,
Neurocomputing
, Vol.
524
, pp.
59
-
68
.
Li
,
H.
,
Yang
,
Y.
,
Chang
,
M.
,
Chen
,
S.
,
Feng
,
H.
,
Xu
,
Z.
,
Li
,
Q.
and
Chen
,
Y.
(
2022
), “
Srdiff: single image super-resolution with diffusion probabilistic models
”,
Neurocomputing
, Vol.
479
, pp.
47
-
59
.
Liang
,
J.
,
Cao
,
J.
,
Sun
,
G.
,
Zhang
,
K.
,
Van Gool
,
L.
and
Timofte
,
R.
(
2021
), “
Swinir: image restoration using swin transformer
”,
Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision
, pp.
1833
-
1844
.
Lim
,
B.
,
Son
,
S.
,
Kim
,
H.
,
Nah
,
S.
and
Lee
,
K.M.
(
2017
), “
Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution
”,
Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
, pp.
136
-
144
.
Liu
,
A.
,
Liu
,
Y.
,
Gu
,
J.
,
Qiao
,
Y.
and
Dong
,
C.
(
2022
), “
Blind image super-resolution: a survey and beyond
”,
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
.
Nagayama
,
Y.
,
Ishiuchi
,
S.
,
Inoue
,
T.
,
Funama
,
Y.
,
Shigematsu
,
S.
,
Emoto
,
T.
,
Sakabe
,
D.
,
Ueda
,
H.
,
Chiba
,
Y.
,
Ito
,
Y.
,
Kidoh
,
M.
,
Oda
,
S.
,
Nakaura
,
T.
and
Hirai
,
T.
(
2025
), “
Super-resolution deep-learning reconstruction with 1024 matrix improves CT image quality for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma assessment
”,
European Journal of Radiology
, Vol.
184
, p.
111953
.
Radford
,
A.
,
Narasimhan
,
K.
,
Salimans
,
T.
,
Sutskever
,
I.
, et al. (
2018
), “
Improving language understanding by generative pre-training
”.
Radford
,
A.
,
Wu
,
J.
,
Child
,
R.
,
Luan
,
D.
,
Amodei
,
D.
and
Sutskever
,
I.
(
2019
), “
Language models are unsupervised multitask learners
”,
OpenAI Blog
, Vol.
1
No.
8
, p.
9
.
Selvaraju
,
R.R.
,
Cogswell
,
M.
,
Das
,
A.
,
Vedantam
,
R.
,
Parikh
,
D.
and
Batra
,
D.
(
2017
), “
Grad-cam: visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization
”,
Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision
, pp.
618
-
626
.
Suárez
,
P.L.
,
Carpio
,
D.
and
Sappa
,
A.D.
(
2023
), “
Enhancement of guided thermal image super-resolution approaches
”,
Neurocomputing
, Vol.
573
, p.
127197
.
Sun
,
L.
,
Pan
,
J.
and
Tang
,
J.
(
2022
), “
ShuffleMixer: an efficient ConvNet for image super-resolution
”,
arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.15175
.
Van der Maaten
,
L.
and
Hinton
,
G.
(
2008
), “
Visualizing data using t-SNE
”,
Journal of Machine Learning Research
, Vol.
9
No.
11
.
Wang
,
Z.
,
Chen
,
J.
and
Hoi
,
S.C.
(
2020
), “
Deep learning for image super-resolution: a survey
”,
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
, Vol.
43
No.
10
, pp.
3365
-
3387
.
Wang
,
X.
,
Xie
,
L.
,
Dong
,
C.
and
Shan
,
Y.
(
2021a
), “
Real-ESRGAN: training real-world blind super-resolution with pure synthetic data
”,
Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision
, pp.
1905
-
1914
.
Wang
,
Z.
,
Lu
,
Y.
,
Li
,
W.
,
Wang
,
S.
,
Wang
,
X.
and
Chen
,
X.
(
2021b
), “
Single image super-resolution with attention-based densely connected module
”,
Neurocomputing
, Vol.
453
, pp.
876
-
884
.
Wang
,
H.
,
Song
,
K.
,
Fan
,
J.
,
Wang
,
Y.
,
Xie
,
J.
and
Zhang
,
Z.
(
2023
), “
Hard patches mining for masked image modeling
”,
arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05919
.
Wang
,
X.
,
Yu
,
K.
,
Wu
,
S.
,
Gu
,
J.
,
Liu
,
Y.
,
Dong
,
C.
,
Qiao
,
Y.
and
Loy
,
C.C.
(
2018
), “
ESRGAN: enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks
”,
Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops
.
Xie
,
J.
,
Gong
,
L.
,
Shao
,
S.
,
Lin
,
S.
and
Luo
,
L.
(
2023
), “
Hybrid knowledge distillation from intermediate layers for efficient single image super-resolution
”,
Neurocomputing
, Vol.
554
, p.
126592
.
Yoo
,
J.
,
Kim
,
T.
,
Lee
,
S.
,
Kim
,
S.H.
,
Lee
,
H.
and
Kim
,
T.H.
(
2023
), “
Enriched CNN-transformer feature aggregation networks for super-resolution
”,
Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)
.
Yu
,
B.
,
Ozdemir
,
S.
,
Dong
,
Y.
,
Shao
,
W.
,
Shi
,
K.
and
Gong
,
K.
(
2024
), “
Pet image denoising based on 3D denoising diffusion probabilistic model: evaluations on total-body datasets
”,
International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention
, pp.
541
-
550
.
Yu
,
W.
,
Li
,
Z.
,
Liu
,
Q.
,
Jiang
,
F.
,
Guo
,
C.
and
Zhang
,
S.
(
2023
), “
Scale-aware frequency attention network for super-resolution
”,
Neurocomputing
, Vol.
554
, p.
126584
.
Yu
,
B.
,
Ozdemir
,
S.
,
Dong
,
Y.
,
Shao
,
W.
,
Pan
,
T.
,
Shi
,
K.
and
Gong
,
K.
(
2025
), “
Robust whole-body PET image denoising using 3D diffusion models: evaluation across various scanners, tracers, and dose levels
”,
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
, Vol.
52
No.
7
, pp.
2549
-
2562
.
Zhang
,
X.
,
Zeng
,
H.
,
Guo
,
S.
and
Zhang
,
L.
(
2022
), “
Efficient long-range attention network for image super-resolution
”,
Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XVII
, pp.
649
-
667
.
Zhang
,
Y.
,
Li
,
K.
,
Li
,
K.
,
Wang
,
L.
,
Zhong
,
B.
and
Fu
,
Y.
(
2018
), “
Image super-resolution using very deep residual channel attention networks
”,
ECCV
, pp.
286
-
301
.
Zhong
,
Z.
,
Zheng
,
L.
,
Kang
,
G.
,
Li
,
S.
and
Yang
,
Y.
(
2020
), “
Random erasing data augmentation
”,
Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
, Vol.
34
, No.
7
, pp.
13001
-
13008
.

Languages

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal