In the Annual Report of the General Purposes Committee of the Middlesex County Council for the year ending March 31, 1909, it is stated that inquiries were made as to the action taken under the Dairies, Cowsheds, and Milkshops Orders of 1885 and 1899 by the thirty‐six district councils in the county, the object of such action being the detection of cows suffering from tuberculosis of the udder. It might be thought that by this time the necessity for putting these orders into force had been thoroughly proved. The Royal Commission on Tuberculosis made a definite statement to the effect that milk derived from tuberculous cattle is one of the principal causes of tubercular disease in the human subject, and, apparently there seems to be some disposition on the part of local authorities to make tuberculosis notifiable. The Public Health (Tuberculosis) Regulations, 1908, which came into force at the beginning of 1909, require that all cases of pulmonary tuberculosis are to be notified to the sanitary authority if the patients are receiving treatment from the Poor Law medical officers. Large sums are spent every year throughout the country on the upkeep of sanatoria with the object of curing cases of tubercle, if possible, but, in any case, of alleviating the sufferings of those afflicted with tuberculosis. On all sides, in fact, it is now recognised that the most energetic measures are necessary in order to combat this terrible disease. It appears from the figures given in the Report referred to that in twenty‐three out of the thirty‐six districts. “No veterinary examinations of cows were made on behalf of the local authorities!” The statement is not made the subject of comment, but we hardly think that the county authorities can regard the results of their enquiry as satisfactory. The Report was apparently presented to the County Council on July 22 last, so that up to that time, at least, it would seem that these twenty‐three districts, in a county with about one million inhabitants, are governed, so far as sanitary matters go, by people who consider themselves qualified to hold opinions diametrically opposed to those held by experts and based on the best scientific evidence at present available.
Article navigation
1 December 1909
Review Article|
December 01 1909
British Food Journal Volume 11 Issue 12 1909 Available to Purchase
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-4108
Print ISSN: 0007-070X
© MCB UP Limited
1909
British Food Journal (1909) 11 (12): 215–234.
Citation
(1909), "British Food Journal Volume 11 Issue 12 1909". British Food Journal, Vol. 11 No. 12 pp. 215–234, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb010978
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
British Food Journal Volume 32 Issue 10 1930
British Food Journal (October,1930)
British Food Journal Volume 10 Issue 8 1908
British Food Journal (August,1908)
British Food Journal Volume 26 Issue 2 1924
British Food Journal (February,1924)
British Food Journal Volume 10 Issue 2 1908
British Food Journal (February,1908)
British Food Journal Volume 4 Issue 5 1902
British Food Journal (May,1902)
Related Chapters
Circular building design: Novel approaches, methods and solutions
Conceptual Structural Design
Index
Conceptual Structural Design
Chapter 3 Why did Russia fail in its agricultural reform? A comparative analysis of property rights in Russia and the Baltic countries
Beyond the Rural-Urban Divide: Cross-Continental Perspectives on the Differentiated Countryside and its Regulation
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
