Few will complain that 1974 has not been an eventful year; in a number of significant respects, it has made history. Local Government and National Health Services reorganizations are such events. This is indeed the day of the extra‐large authority, massive monoliths for central administration, metropolitan conurbations for regional control, district councils corresponding to the large authorities of other days; and in a sense, it is not local government any more. As in other fields, the “big batallions” acquire greater collective power than the total sum of the smaller units, can wield it more effectively, even ruthlessly, but rarely appearing to take into account the masses of little people, the quiet people, who cannot make themselves heard. As expected, new names of authorities are replacing the old; new titles for departments and officers, ambitious and high‐sounding; a little grandiose for the tongues of ordinary folk. Another history‐making event of 1974, in the nature of a departmental transfer but highly significant for the course of future events as far as work in the field is concerned, was handing over of the personal health services—health of expectant mothers, babies, children, domiciliary midwifery, the school health services and their mainly medical and nursing personnel—from local health authorities to the newly created area health authorities. The public health departments over fifty years and more had created them, built them up into the highly efficient services they are. If anything can be learned from the past, new authorities are always more expensive than those they replace; they spend freely and are lavish with their accommodation and furnishings. In their first few months of existence, the new bodies have proved they are no exception. News of their meetings and activities in many areas is now scanty; even local newspapers which usually thrive on Council news—or quarrels—seem to have been caught on the wrong foot, especially in the small towns now merged into larger units. The public are relatively uninformed, but this doubtless will soon be rectified.
Article navigation
1 June 1974
Review Article|
June 01 1974
British Food Journal Volume 76 Issue 6 1974 Available to Purchase
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-4108
Print ISSN: 0007-070X
© MCB UP Limited
1974
British Food Journal (1974) 76 (6): 161–192.
Citation
(1974), "British Food Journal Volume 76 Issue 6 1974". British Food Journal, Vol. 76 No. 6 pp. 161–192, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb011701
Download citation file:
417
Views
Suggested Reading
Enablers and barriers in adopting a reablement model of domiciliary care
Journal of Integrated Care (February,2021)
The Emerging Role of the Domiciliary Pharmacist in Devon
Journal of Integrated Care (October,2007)
Fragmented time and domiciliary care quality
Employee Relations: The International Journal (January,2020)
An Outcome‐Based Approach to Domiciliary Care
Journal of Integrated Care (June,2005)
Quasi‐marketisation in domiciliary care: varied patterns, similar problems?
International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy (April,2011)
Related Chapters
The “Concept” of Spirituality
Frank H. Knight in Iowa City, 1919–1928
Combining the Masculine and the Feminine in Family Business: A Case Study on Inclusive, Shared Leadership in a Second-Generation Family Firm
The Power of Inclusion in Family Business
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
