First Page Preview

First page of Introduction to Case Studies

The case studies in Chapter 7 demonstrate efforts to engage in qualitative research projects with individuals from communities which have been marginalized, minoritized, or disenfranchised. Though the approaches demonstrated are not consistent and some frankly fail to reach the standards described by the previous chapters, all demonstrate different aspects of what could be considered the ideal. This is by no means a pejorative criticism of the projects. In many cases, projects are reported as they are due to the constraints of publication or the presumption of basic expectations for the conduct of inquiry including meaning making. In other cases, this is due to the nature of the parameters imposed by discipline and background. However, all have been selected as strong examples of work which are fruitful for consideration and reflection. We encourage all readers to learn from what is included but also to interrogate each of the studies reported for it is from practice, experience, and reflection that the best learning occurs. Every reader will identify something they would do differently or questions they would ask of the authors or even things that they might argue were inappropriate. It is important to consider all of this and especially the rationale for the critique. These case studies can provide a strong basis for individual and community reflection and as with all work in (social) science, serve as a basis for learning and improvement.

Licensed reuse rights only
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.