This paper describes SPICE (Structure Process Improvement for Construction Enterprises), which is a process improvement framework for construction organizations. SPICE is a five level step by step maturity framework. It assesses an organization’s performance against levels of process maturity, identifies their strengths and weaknesses and highlights their improvement priorities. SPICE was developed in close collaboration with the construction industry and tested on real projects. This allowed the framework to take into account practical industrial needs. This paper provides an outline of the SPICE framework. It focuses on a best practice case study of SPICE implementation on a partnering relationship between a major client and a major contractor. The paper details the SPICE assessment and fact finding process. Based on this assessment, it identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the partnering operation and provides specific guidelines for project improvement. Main strengths of the partnering included: (1) close physical proximity of client, design and project management teams; (2) top level commitment to improve productivity; and (3) adoption of manufacturing philosophies and methods in order to deliver improvements. Main weaknesses included: (1) lack of integration between systems and processes of the partnering organizations; (2) presence of cultural and incentive differences between the partnering organizations, which led to fragmentation of the project teams; and (3) little evidence of process evaluation and improvement efforts by the teams. Based on these, some recommendations are made for future improvements.
Article navigation
1 June 2004
Technical Paper|
June 01 2004
Improving project processes: best practice case study
M. Sarshar;
M. Sarshar
Faculty of Built Environment, University of West of England
Search for other works by this author on:
R. Haigh;
R. Haigh
School of Construction Management, University of Salford
Search for other works by this author on:
D. Amaratunga
D. Amaratunga
School of Construction Management, University of Salford
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1477-0857
Print ISSN: 1471-4175
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2004
Construction Innovation: Information Process Management (2004) 4 (2): 69–82.
Citation
Sarshar M, Haigh R, Amaratunga D (2004), "Improving project processes: best practice case study". Construction Innovation: Information Process Management, Vol. 4 No. 2 pp. 69–82, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14714170410815015
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
SPICE: a business process diagnostics tool for construction projects
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management (March,2000)
Critical success factors for configuration management implementation
Industrial Management & Data Systems (March,2013)
Lean leadership in major projects: from “predict and provide” to “predict and prevent”
International Journal of Operations & Production Management (May,2018)
A study on how to improve the throughput time of Lean Six Sigma projects in a construction company
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma (May,2014)
Are agile organisations more process mature? Business process agility and process maturity as leverage for business performance
Business Process Management Journal (January,2025)
Related Chapters
The Role of Operations in a Mega Project
Crossrail Project: Infrastructure Design and Construction
Case studies
Programme Management in Construction
Civil engineering projects
Civil Engineering Procedure
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
