Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to study the Machiavellianism of undergraduates and how it relates to their attitudes about hypothetical marketing moral dilemmas.

Design/methodology/approach

The 309 participants are presented with nine ethical scenarios after completing the Mach IV scale.

Findings

As hypothesized, undergraduates low in Machiavellianism believe the ethically questionable action is wrong, anticipate guilt if they consider doing the same thing, and say they would not do it. All correlations are significant at the 0.01 level (two‐tail).

Practical implications

Organizations can use the data to increase their global competitiveness.

Originality/value

The investigation is the first to assess the association of Machiavellianism and purely marketing moral scenarios. Educators can focus business ethics training on high Machs.

You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal