Skip to Main Content

Active learning is an approach to teaching that has become very popular in many institutions of higher education across the United States, particularly in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics courses. Although it can be defined in a variety of ways, active learning basically consists of the following:

  • students are involved in more than listening;

  • less emphasis is placed on transmitting information and more on developing students’ skills;

  • students are involved in higher-order thinking (analysis, synthesis, evaluation);

  • students are engaged in activities (e.g., reading, discussing, writing); and

  • greater emphasis is placed on students’ exploration of their own attitudes and values (Bonwell & Eison, 1991, p. 2).

Others, such as the “AUSSE/NSSE [define] active learning as ‘students’ efforts to actively construct their knowledge’” (ACER, 2007, as cited in Carr, Palmer, & Hagel, 2015, p. 2). However one defines it, online learning environments are shaped by how learners interact. Yet, what does “interaction” mean and look like in online courses?

Interaction, “commonly understood as actions among individuals” (Abrami, Bernard, Bures, Borokhovski, & Tamim, 2011, p. 86), occurs in online courses through student-to-content, student-to-student, and student-to-instructor interactions (Abrami et al., 2011; Bernard et al., 2009; Moore, 1989). Therefore, to involve online learners in active learning, instructors and instructional designers should consider ways in which students might interact with content, their fellow peers, and their instructor(s).

Research on the use of active learning techniques has shown that it increases student performance in a variety of content areas (e.g., Arthurs & Kreager, 2017; Carr et al., 2015; Chen, Bastedo, & Howard, 2018; Freeman et al., 2014) and provides “significant opportunities … for improved student performance and new datasets for educational research” (Sit & Brudzinski, 2017, p. 629). The next sections provide examples of interaction that can be achieved in online courses.

  • Students answer questions or take a quiz online while watching or after watching an instructional video or short lecture.

  • Students analyze a case study or solve a real-world problem. The content can be print-based or can also incorporate multimedia.

  • Students complete polls about content, where relevant, immediate feedback can be provided.

  • Students annotate readings. This could be scaffolded with prompts embedded in readings.

  • Students engage with simulations.

  • Students work with peers collaboratively to complete group assignments.

  • Students engage with their peers in online discussions.

  • Students are encouraged (or required) to form study groups to learn from and with one another.

  • Students participate in mock trials or debates to argue different perspectives.

  • Students conduct peer review (i.e., provide constructive and critical feedback) of their peers’ work.

  • Students brainstorm ideas to solve problems or to answer a question.

  • Students engage in group or team, online scavenger hunts or an escape room/digital breakout related to the content.

  • Instructors engage with students in online discussions. To ensure learning is “active,” instructors should craft discussion questions at the higher levels of the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy (Milman, 2009).

  • Students and instructors have web-conferences to discuss questions and/or touch base about progress on assignments and/or comprehension of material.

  • Instructors record Q & A videos that answer questions students might have about content. This can also be conducted live and recorded/shared with those unable to attend synchronously.

Below are some additional resources for designing active learning that I have referred to in my own teaching:

Allen, M. W., & Bingham, T. (2016). Michael Allen’s guide to e-learning: Building interactive, fun, and effective learning programs for any company . Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Biech, E., Silberman, M., & Auerbach, C. (2015). 101 more ways to make training active. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Buckley, K. M., Beyna, B., Dudley-Brown, S. (2005). Promoting active learning through on-line discussion boards. Nurse Educator, 30(1), 32-36.

Silberman, M. L., & Biech, E. (2015). Active training: A handbook of techniques, designs, case examples, and tips. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

University of Illinois. (n.d.). Online instructional activities index. Retrieved from https://www.uis.edu/ion/resources/instructional-activities-index/

Abrami
,
P. C.
,
Bernard
,
R. M.
,
Bures
,
E. M.
,
Borokhovski
,
E.
, &
Tamim
,
R. M.
(
2011
)
Interaction in distance education and online learning: Using evidence and theory to improve practice
.
Journal of Computing in Higher Education
,
23
(
2–3
),
82
103
.
Arthurs
,
L. L.
, &
Kreager
,
B. Z.
(
2017
).
An integrative review of in-class activities that enable active learning in college science classroom settings
.
International Journal of Science Education
,
39
(
15
),
2073
2091
.
Bernard
,
R. M.
,
Abrami
,
P. C.
,
Borokhovski
,
E.
,
Wade
,
C. A.
,
Tamim
,
R. M.
,
Surkes
,
M. A.
, &
Bethel
,
E. C.
(
2009
).
A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education
.
Review of Educational Research
,
79
(
3
),
1243
1289
.
Bonwell
,
C. C.
, &
Eison
,
J. A.
(
1991
).
Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASH#-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1
.
Washington, DC
:
The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development
.
Retrieved from
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fuUtext/ED336049.pdf
Carr
,
R.
,
Palmer
,
S.
, &
Hagel
,
P.
(
2015
).
Active learning: The importance of developing a comprehensive measure
.
Active learning in Higher Education
,
16
(
3
),
173
186
.
Chen
,
B.
,
Bastedo
,
K.
, &
Howard
,
W.
(
2018
).
Exploring design elements for online STEM courses: Active learning, engagement & assessment design
.
Online Learning
,
22
(
2
),
59
75
. doi:
Freeman
,
S.
,
Eddy
,
S. L.
,
McDonough
,
M.
,
Smith
,
M. K.
,
Okoroafor
,
N.
,
Jordt
,
H.
,
Wenderoth
,
M. P.
(
2014
).
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics
.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
,
111
(
23
),
8410
8415
.
Milman
,
N. B.
(
2009
).
Crafting the “right” online discussion questions using the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy as a framework
.
Distance Learning
,
6
(
4
),
61
64
.
Moore
,
M. G.
(
1989
).
Three types of interaction
.
American Journal of Distance Education
,
3
(
2
),
1
6
.
Sit
,
S. M.
, &
Brudzinski
,
M. R.
(
2017
).
Creation and assessment of an active e-learning introductory geology course
.
Journal of Science Education and Technology
,
26
(
6
),
629
645
.
Licensed re-use rights only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal