This study aims to propose a meta-analytical framework using the underpinnings of cognitive-affective-conative framework to synthesize the online shopping cart abandonment (OSCA) literature. Further, this study identifies consistent relationships between OSCA and its antecedents from global perspective.
This study synthesized the findings of 72 studies by performing a meta-analysis using bivariate analysis and meta-analysis structural equation modeling. Additionally, heterogeneity tests and moderation analysis were conducted to examine the reasons for inconsistent findings.
The results indicate that while cognitive factors, i.e. attitude towards website-related factors (perceived informational and visual effectiveness) mitigate customer hesitation leading to OSCA, personal factors (perceived risk, perceived cost and perceived transaction inconvenience) trigger it. Moderation analysis shows that these effects vary in the OSCA literature depending on differences in methodological (gender dominance, country of the study and sample characteristics) and contextual (buying process stage, product categories and time period) factors across studies in the OSCA literature.
This study synthesized the most popularly studied factors in OSCA domain. Future empirical studies can focus on understudied factors that have been suggested in future research directions.
This study suggests pragmatic strategies, such as incorporating augmented reality, corporate digital responsibility and targeted deals to mitigate OSCA and address customer hesitation.
This study, being a pioneer meta-analysis in OSCA domain, offers novel insights into the OSCA literature. This study proposes a model using the cognitive-affective-conative framework to consolidate the relationships between the antecedents in the OSCA domain and also demonstrates potential causes of contradictory results reported in this domain. Thus, this meta-analysis is a silver line in the OSCA domain.
