A number of Australian states have employed private correctional companies to both manage, and design and construct their own facilities. Such projects have employed alternative delivery methods from what had been traditionally procured state facilities. The study highlights private prison operators' responses to the evaluation of their Request for Proposal by state governments. The findings reveal that although the evaluation of tender bids by the participating state governments was appropriate, various problems were encountered with the evaluation methodology employed to assess and award tenders. The study shows that the areas of concern include the: suitability and reliability of the evaluation methods; reactions to the bid outcomes; appropriateness of the debriefing sessions. The study shows that operators would prefer fundamental changes to the evaluation methodologies of the design and construction component of the private prison request for proposal evaluation.
Article navigation
1 April 2004
Research Article|
April 01 2004
The evaluation of private prison design and construction submissions in Australia: prison operator responses
Giustina G.S. Consoli
Giustina G.S. Consoli
Barrister and Solicitor of the Supreme Court of South Australia and Sessional Academic, School of International Business, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7131
Print ISSN: 0263-2772
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2004
Facilities (2004) 22 (5-6): 114–119.
Citation
Consoli GG (2004), "The evaluation of private prison design and construction submissions in Australia: prison operator responses". Facilities, Vol. 22 No. 5-6 pp. 114–119, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770410540324
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Prescriptive versus non‐prescriptive prison design briefs: Architect responses to interpreting Australian private prison design briefs
Facilities (April,2005)
Determinants of rework in building construction projects
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management (August,2004)
Are health‐promoting prisons an impossibility? Lessons from England and Wales
Health Education (October,2002)
Architectural and building features disparity and preservation of structural and fabrics integrity
Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology (March,2008)
Dismantling the public sector bastion: evaluating capital works
International Journal of Public Sector Management (April,2010)
Related Chapters
Inquiry-Based Formative Assessment for Improving Student Learning
Using Informative Assessments towards Effective Literacy Instruction
Learning Space Evaluations – Timing, Team, Techniques
The Future of Learning and Teaching in Next Generation Learning Spaces
Chapter 12 Immigration: America's Nineteenth-Century “Law and Order Problem?”
Migration and Culture
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
