New technologies are posing new challenges to social science. Their very novelty also challenges the established methods that social research institutions have used to define their priorities. The UK’s Economic and Social research Council (ESRC) confronted these challenges, in part, by commissioning a futures study. It engaged the Institute for Alternative Futures (IAF) and the Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition (CRIC), to develop quickly a process for informing the choice of social science research priorities related to genomics. Four major reports were developed as background inputs to a scenario workshop process. As well as outlining a set of scenarios for the development of the genomics field, reports covered genomic applications, forecasts for drivers shaping genomics, and how the ESRC’s “thematic priorities” might relate to developments in genomics in the coming years. With this input and using advanced “groupware”, the scenario workshop identified five priority areas focused on how research should be conducted and 11 priority topics for what research is needed.
Article navigation
1 August 2002
Review Article|
August 01 2002
Social science research priorities related to genomics: The “bottom line” for the ESRC genomics scenarios project Available to Purchase
Clement Bezold;
Clement Bezold
Clement Bezold (cbezold@altfutures.com) is President of the Institute for Alternative Futures, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Ian Miles
Ian Miles
Ian Miles (ian.miles@man.ac.uk) is Director of the Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1465-9832
Print ISSN: 1463-6689
© MCB UP Limited
2002
Foresight (2002) 4 (4): 36–42.
Citation
Bezold C, Miles I (2002), "Social science research priorities related to genomics: The “bottom line” for the ESRC genomics scenarios project". Foresight, Vol. 4 No. 4 pp. 36–42, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680210445947
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Social Sciences Research: : Writing Strategies for Students
Reference Reviews (May,2000)
The A‐Z of Social Research
Reference Reviews (August,2003)
Moving the drama into the factory: the contribution of metaphors to services research
European Journal of Marketing (September,1996)
Mary Parker Follett: prophet of chaos and complexity
Journal of Management History (Archive) (June,2000)
Related Chapters
Why the Biomedical Research Ethics Model Is Inappropriate for Social Sciences: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat
Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences
About ‘Othering’ Ourselves in a System with Discrepant Values: The Research Ethics Review Process Today
Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences
Towards Common Principles for Social Science Research Ethics: A Discussion Document for the Academy of Social Sciences
Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
