The decision problem for Boolean satisfiability, generally referred to as SAT, is the archetypal NP-complete problem, and encodings of many problems of practical interest exist allowing them to be treated as SAT problems. Its generalization to quantified SAT (QSAT) is PSPACE-complete, and is useful for the same reason. Despite the computational complexity of SAT and QSAT, methods have been developed allowing large instances to be solved within reasonable resource constraints. These techniques have largely exploited algorithmic developments; however machine learning also exerts a significant influence in the development of state-of- the-art solvers. Here, the application of machine learning is delicate, as in many cases, even if a relevant learning problem can be solved, it may be that incorporating the result into a SAT or QSAT solver is counterproductive, because the run-time of such solvers can be sensitive to small implementation changes. The application of better machine learning methods in this area is thus an ongoing challenge, with characteristics unique to the field. This work provides a comprehensive review of the research to date on incorporating machine learning into SAT and QSAT solvers, as a resource for those interested in further advancing the field.
Article navigation
22 November 2021
Research Article|
November 22 2021
Machine Learning for Automated Theorem Proving: Learning to Solve SAT and QSAT Available to Purchase
Sean B. Holden
Sean B. Holden
University of Cambridge
, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1935-8245
Print ISSN: 1935-8237
© 2021 S. B. Holden
2021
S. B. Holden
Licensed re-use rights only
Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning (2021) 14 (6): 807–889.
Citation
Holden SB (2021), "Machine Learning for Automated Theorem Proving: Learning to Solve SAT and QSAT". Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, Vol. 14 No. 6 pp. 807–889, doi: https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000081
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Related Chapters
The Mathematically Gifted Korean Elementary Students’ Revisiting of Euler’s Polyhedron Theorem
Creativity, Giftedness, and Talent Development in Mathematics
Why Is “Stigler’s Coase Theorem” Stiglerian? A Methodological Explanation
Including a Symposium on Bruce Caldwell’s Beyond Positivism After 35 Years
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
