The relevance of academic research to marketing practitioners has been openly questioned in the literature. Do papers in leading journals provide useful frameworks, conclusions, and recommendations for marketing practitioners? Or is the gap between academia and practice simply too wide? More specifically, is academic research useful for those senior executives charged with developing strategy and delivering results for their organization — colloquially known as the C-suite — the decisionmakers who also determine the status of marketing within their organization? To answer this question, I review the strategic marketing literature to understand what we have learned over the decade from 2004 to 2014 and to assess the relevance of this learning to the Csuite. Contrary to the assertion that this literature has little to say to practitioners, I find many valuable bodies of knowledge on themes of high relevance to the C-suite, from which I draw conclusions in five important domains. These are the financial impact of marketing, digital marketing, innovation, marketing capabilities and societal concerns. While the advances in research in these domains over the decade are impressive, I conclude that where marketing as an academic discipline has to do better is communicating these insights to the highest levels of business.
Article navigation
30 October 2015
Research Article|
October 30 2015
Strategic Marketing for the C-suite: A Review of the Research Literature and its Relevance to Senior Executives
David Midgley
David Midgley
INSEAD Europe Campus, Boulevard de Constance
, 77305 Fontainebleau Cedex, France
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1555-0761
Print ISSN: 1555-0753
© 2015 D. Midgley
2015
D. Midgley
Licensed re-use rights only
Foundations and Trends in Marketing (2015) 8 (3): 147–341.
Citation
Midgley D (2015), "Strategic Marketing for the C-suite: A Review of the Research Literature and its Relevance to Senior Executives". Foundations and Trends in Marketing, Vol. 8 No. 3 pp. 147–341, doi: https://doi.org/10.1561/1700000018
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Christensen updates disruption theory
Strategy & Leadership (March,2016)
Three trips around the innovation track: an interview with Clayton Christensen
Strategy & Leadership (August,2005)
A synergetics approach to disruptive innovation
Kybernetes (December,2002)
Generating historically-based stress scenarios using parsimonious factorization
Journal of Risk Finance (November,2014)
Related Chapters
Chapter 9 An Autopoietic Understanding of “Innovative Organization”
Advanced Series in Management
Entrepreneurs’ Opportunities in Technology-Based Markets
Technological Entrepreneurship
A Critical Insight on Innovation Theories: Introducing Responsible Jobs to Be Done Theory
Toward Responsible Service Management: AI and Digital Transformation in Action
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
