Examines the relative importance of institutional and resource dependent explanations versus managerial explanations of variations of formal and informal work‐family responsiveness. Work‐family responsiveness is defined in two ways: formal policies and practices that an organization offers, designed to assist employees to balance their work and family lives; and a work environment that is accommodating of its employees’ work‐family needs. Focuses attention on the important role that managerial attitudes have on the provision of work‐family practices and an accommodating work‐family workplace. Concludes that by integrating the insights of several theoretical perspectives, a more comprehensive model of organizational responsiveness in relation to work‐family practices is developed and a set of testable propositions that can guide future research can be made. Indicates that an additive theoretical model combining managerial and institutional factors offers the most appropriate theoretical explanation for identifying factors related to the provision of work‐family benefits and whether the workplace is accommodating of work‐family issues.
Article navigation
1 February 2003
This article was originally published in
Women In Management Review
Research Article|
February 01 2003
The provision of formal and informal work‐family practices: the relative importance of institutional and resource dependent explanations versus managerial explanations Available to Purchase
E. Anne Bardoel
E. Anne Bardoel
E. Anne Bardoel is a Senior Lecturer at the Department of Management, Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Caulfield East, Victoria, Australia.
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7182
Print ISSN: 0964-9425
© MCB UP Limited
2003
Women In Management Review (2003) 18 (1-2): 7–19.
Citation
Anne Bardoel E (2003), "The provision of formal and informal work‐family practices: the relative importance of institutional and resource dependent explanations versus managerial explanations". Women In Management Review, Vol. 18 No. 1-2 pp. 7–19, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420310462299
Download citation file:
509
Views
Suggested Reading
Work‐life policy: does it do exactly what it says on the tin?
Women In Management Review (February,2003)
Can we live with the changing nature of work?
Journal of Managerial Psychology (December,1999)
Cultural revitalisation: The importance of acknowledging the values of an organization's “golden era” when promoting work‐life balance
Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal (May,2008)
Restructuring workplace cultures: the ultimate work‐family challenge?
Women In Management Review (February,2001)
UK firms introduce work/life balance perks to tempt staff
Leadership & Organization Development Journal (March,2000)
Related Chapters
The Effects of Ownership on Labor Standards in China: A Comparison of Foreign Multinationals and Indigenous Firms
Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations
An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Employment on the First Birth Decision for Married Women in Taiwan
Advances in Pacific Basin Business, Economics and Finance
Flexible Working Conditions in the Republic of Belarus: Legal Regulation and Special Cases
Flexible Work Arrangements: Global Insights
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
