Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

This paper aims to investigate the experiences of managers who underwent a training needs analysis (TNA) within a large bus transport company. It compares their perceptions of the TNA process with two external groups of training managers and training consultants. Recommendations are made to address and reconcile the differing interpretations and misunderstandings which occur between the different groups about TNA.

Design/methodology/approach

The approach uses qualitative grounded theory to identify the main perspectives about the purpose of training needs analysis.

Findings

The findings are that business needs are the main focus of the TNA. The various actors in the TNA process should be aware of their part in the process. Line managers should receive instruction in TNA.

Originality/value

The article addresses the similarities and differences which are found among training managers, training consultants, and managers who were recipients of training needs analysis.

You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal