The critical recommendations of the majority report are as follows: • employee representation on company boards should be compulsory in companies with 2 000 employees or more • this representation should be based on the present unitary board and not on the supervisory board principle • there should be three groups of director: one representing shareholders; another representing employees and a third group of co‐opted members acceptable to both the other groups • the shareholder representatives and the employee representatives should be equal in number and each group, separately, should be greater than the number of co‐opted members. (This is the 2x + y formula.) • employee directors should be chosen solely through trade union machinery • only unionised employees should influence the choice of employee directors • this influence should be exercised exclusively through a Joint Representation Committee (JRC), representing the unions in the company, and not directly by employees • before any scheme is adopted it must receive the support of more than 50 per cent of the total employee force, through a secret ballot of both the non‐unionised and the unionised employees • for this ballot to be valid at least one third of the eligible employees must vote in it • the new system could be triggered off only by a request to hold such a ballot • the request could come only through the recognised unions in the company • an Industrial Democracy Commission would be formed to supervise and monitor the introduction of the system and to conciliate and adjudicate in certain types of dispute • the system could not be expected to work without a major training effort. (This report is probably unique among government reports in quantifying this effort in terms of time, facilities and cost) • any new law should deal only with representation on company boards and should not concern itself with other forms of representation below this level, eg works councils
Article navigation
1 March 1977
Review Article|
March 01 1977
Bullock report on INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACY: A summary of the majority report, with comment Available to Purchase
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-5767
Print ISSN: 0019-7858
© MCB UP Limited
1977
Industrial and Commercial Training (1977) 9 (3): 93–100.
Citation
WELLENS J (1977), "Bullock report on INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACY: A summary of the majority report, with comment". Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 9 No. 3 pp. 93–100, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb003595
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
DOES BULLOCK OFFER A CARDINAL ROLE FOR THE MIDDLE MANAGERS?
Industrial Management (November,1977)
Legal Aspects of Bullock
Management Research News (January,1978)
The battle over ‘back‐door Bullockism’
Industrial Management (July,1977)
Comment
Pigment & Resin Technology (February,1977)
The Adoption of Industrial Democracy
Personnel Review (April,1977)
Related Chapters
Punitive Publics: Direct Democracy and the Criminal Legal System in the United States
Democracy, Governance, and Law
Afterword: The Teaching Fantasia
Emotion and School: Understanding how the Hidden Curriculum Influences Relationships, Leadership, Teaching, and Learning
Focusing on How Not Why: Examining the Role of Nonprofit Partner Organizations in Campus-Based Civic Engagement Programming
Leaning Into Politics: Higher Education and the Democracy We Need
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
