The purpose of the present studies was to derive an integrative taxonomy of responses to social conflict. In Study 1, we had college‐age participants sort 33 responses to conflict, taken from various research domains, according to their similarities. From this, we generated two different classification systems: a very simple low‐dimensional system, obtained through multi‐dimensional scaling; and a complex high‐dimensional system, obtained through cluster analysis. To aid in the interpretation of the structures, in Study 2 we collected a set of ratings on each of the conflict responses. The results from Study 2 indicated that many of the labels used to describe conflict responses in past research could be used to describe some aspects of these taxonomies. However, no dimension or set of dimensions was sufficient to describe all classes of conflict responses. The results are discussed in terms of their larger theoretical and practical implications.
Article navigation
1 April 1999
Review Article|
April 01 1999
THE COGNITIVE REPRESENTATION OF RESPONSES TO SOCIAL CONFLICT: THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTEGRATIVE TAXONOMY
Jonathan A. Rhoades;
Jonathan A. Rhoades
New York University
Search for other works by this author on:
Josh A. Arnold
Josh A. Arnold
California State University, Long Beach
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-8545
Print ISSN: 1044-4068
© MCB UP Limited
1999
International Journal of Conflict Management (1999) 10 (4): 360–384.
Citation
Rhoades JA, Arnold JA (1999), "THE COGNITIVE REPRESENTATION OF RESPONSES TO SOCIAL CONFLICT: THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTEGRATIVE TAXONOMY". International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 10 No. 4 pp. 360–384, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022830
Download citation file:
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
