The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of abusive supervision on satisfaction with work–leisure balance (WLB) and the mechanisms of action. WLB plays a crucial role in both individual and societal development and how to achieve WLB has attracted considerable attention. Leaders hold a significant position within enterprises, yet it remains unclear whether their leadership style influences employees’ WLB satisfaction.
In this study, the method of multipoint data collection was adopted to measure the subjects; 319 employees were sampled at two timepoints and a structural equation model was established for analysis.
This study revealed a significant negative correlation between abusive supervision and WLB satisfaction and work–leisure conflict (WLC) and work–leisure facilitation (WLF) play significant mediating roles in this relationship. Idiosyncratic deals (I-deals) can mitigate the adverse effects of abusive supervision on WLB satisfaction by moderating the relationship between abusive supervision and WLF.
Based on ego depletion theory, this research investigates the correlation between abusive leadership and WLB satisfaction, along with the underlying mechanisms involved. This research contributes both theoretical insights and practical management recommendations for enhancing employees’ WLB satisfaction.
