A postal questionnaire survey of junior doctors’ views was conducted in a large acute hospital in the south‐east of England, amongst 146 junior medical staff recorded as being employed by the Trust across 21 specialities. It profiled their level of participation in audit and the quality of current audit programmes within their specialities and assessed their knowledge and understanding of clinical governance. Our findings suggest: a high level of involvement in activities labelled audit, but that these activities did not necessarily conform to robust audit methodologies; that junior doctors’ professional attitudes towards clinical audit are influenced by negative experience of undertaking audit within their specialities; and that there was a variety of understanding about the principles and meaning of clinical governance. It concluded that the conditions for coherent strategy aimed at promoting effective audit programmes which could support the use of clinical audit as a tool for continuous professional development are not yet in place across the Trust.
Article navigation
1 November 2000
Research Article|
November 01 2000
Junior doctors’ views on clinical audit – has anything changed? Available to Purchase
Jacqui Nettleton;
Jacqui Nettleton
Clinical Audit Officer, Department of Clinical Audit, Brighton Health Care NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Alan Ireland
Alan Ireland
Associate Medical Director Clinical Audit and Risk Management, Directorate of Professional Practice, Brighton Health Care NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6542
Print ISSN: 0952-6862
© MCB UP Limited
2000
Int J Health Care Qual Assur (2000) 13 (6): 245–254.
Citation
Nettleton J, Ireland A (2000), "Junior doctors’ views on clinical audit – has anything changed?". Int J Health Care Qual Assur, Vol. 13 No. 6 pp. 245–254, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09526860010373217
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Medical Audit: The Views of Junior Doctors
J Manag Med (February,1993)
Managing evidence‐based health care: a diagnostic framework
J Manag Med (June,1998)
The other audit risk: the impact of false rejection on audit planning
Managerial Auditing Journal (February,1997)
Quality matters: junior doctors’ perceptions
J Manag Med (August,1996)
Making any difference? Conceptualising the impact of safeguarding adults boards
The Journal of Adult Protection (December,2019)
Related Chapters
Governance, Risk and Stakeholder Engagement: What Lessons can be Learnt from Mining?
The Governance of Risk
The application of logic to evidence
Forensic engineering: The investigation of failures: Proceedings of the second international conference on forensic engineering organized by the Institution of Civil Engineers and held in London, UK, on 12–13 November 2001
Chapter 6 Response to Intervention (RtI) and Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders
Behavioral Disorders: Practice Concerns and Students with EBD
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
