The article discusses some of the clinical negligence problems and risk management issues arising from training of health professionals (predominantly junior hospital doctors) in practical procedures. There continue to be incidents, claims and complaints in the NHS arising from the clinical practice of doctors or other health professionals who are not perceived to be competent in some of the practical skills they are undertaking. This article addresses some aspects of this training, where it should best be started and who should have responsibility for ensuring that doctors, in particular, continue to work under appropriate supervision. Also acknowledges the current problems facing NHS trusts in trying to ensure that risk management standards are met for training health professionals in the use of medical equipment – a task that has not previously needed to be documented or accounted for on a formal basis. There are considerable resource implications attached to the introduction of systems that can assess and monitor the training provided in the use of medical equipment but the introduction of a baseline assessment is an essential part of sound clinical governance and risk management. It is suggested that risk management exercises of this nature are worthwhile in reducing the potential for harm to patients.
Article navigation
1 December 2000
This article was originally published in
British Journal of Clinical Governance
Viewpoint|
December 01 2000
Clinical risk – minimising harm in practical procedures and use of equipment
Jane Cowan
Jane Cowan
Former Consultant Paediatrician and currently Medico‐legal Adviser to the Risk Management Unit of the Medical Protection Society, Leeds, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1466-4119
Print ISSN: 1466-4100
© MCB UP Limited
2000
British Journal of Clinical Governance (2000) 5 (4): 245–250.
Citation
Cowan J (2000), "Clinical risk – minimising harm in practical procedures and use of equipment". British Journal of Clinical Governance, Vol. 5 No. 4 pp. 245–250, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14664100010362006
Download citation file:
249
Views
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
UK. NHS Foundation Trusts
Int J Health Care Qual Assur (July,2003)
UK. NHS three-year priorities
Int J Health Care Qual Assur (February,2003)
Managing health risks: junior doctors' views of risk and decision making
J Health Organ Manag (June,2004)
The creation of risk‐related information: The UK General Medical Council's electronic database
J Health Organ Manag (November,2010)
Increased liability for construction and design professionals
Structural Survey (July,2005)
Related Chapters
Transforming Professional Bureaucracies in Hospitals and Higher Education Institutions
Towards A Comparative Institutionalism: Forms, Dynamics And Logics Across The Organizational Fields Of Health Care And Higher Education
Can Care and Cure Coexist in Age of Internet Influenced Healthcare? Psychological Androgyny and Interpersonal Competence in Indian Doctors
Emotions and Service in the Digital Age
By what Means are Medical Professionals Able to Reject Hostile Environment Policy within the NHS?
Privatisation of Migration Control: Power without Accountability?
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
