This paper explores the growing interest of Health Service researchers in evaluating processes or process evaluation and discusses the relevance of this type of evaluation to the National Health Service (NHS( in the UK. Increased focus has been given to issues of evidence‐based health care since the introduction of the NHS R&D strategy in 1991. Nevertheless, there is a need to understand complex ways of working, particularly as changes in practice rarely follow a linear pattern. The basic principles of process evaluation and its links to social science methodologies are outlined, including the importance of context and the role of stakeholders, and how process evaluation can assist health professionals in their work is explored. It is then shown how the process evaluations linked to four initiatives designed to promote evidence‐based decision making or change clinicians’ behaviour were crucial for understanding the reasons for the outcomes of the initiatives.
Article navigation
1 September 2002
This article was originally published in
British Journal of Clinical Governance
Review Article|
September 01 2002
Evaluating processes for evidence‐based health care in the National Health Service Available to Purchase
Beverly Warburton;
Beverly Warburton
Training Manager at University College Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Mary Black
Mary Black
Research Fellow at the Institute for Public Health Research and Policy, University of Salford, Salford, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1466-4119
Print ISSN: 1466-4100
© MCB UP Limited
2002
British Journal of Clinical Governance (2002) 7 (3): 158–164.
Citation
Warburton B, Black M (2002), "Evaluating processes for evidence‐based health care in the National Health Service". British Journal of Clinical Governance, Vol. 7 No. 3 pp. 158–164, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14664100210438244
Download citation file:
355
Views
Suggested Reading
Medical managers can make research‐based management decisions
J Manag Med (December,1998)
Recent service evaluation research on people with learning difficulties
Int J Health Care Qual Assur (December,1997)
Quality Assurance and the Logic of Evaluation
Int J Health Care Qual Assur (May,1991)
A class of its own: latent class segmentation and its implications for qualitative segmentation research
Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal (June,2003)
Qualitative research requires quality concepts of its own
Management Decision (September,2001)
Related Chapters
Mentoring Institutional Change: Intergenerational Construction of Meso-Structure and the Emergence of New Logics in American Healthcare
Agents, Actors, Actorhood: Institutional Perspectives on the Nature of Agency, Action, and Authority
The Ethics of Research in Humanitarian Action
Ethics in a Crowded World: Globalisation, Human Movement and Professional Ethics
Evidence-Based Medicine and the Limits of Standardization
Health and Health Care Inequities, Infectious Diseases and Social Factors
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
