The mortality rate due to intrapartum asphyxia is generally considered a good guide to the quality of perinatal care. Using a routine system of surveillance, we identified a six‐fold difference in mortality rate due to intrapartum asphyxia depending on the hospital of birth, with the lowest rate (95 per cent confidence intervals) of 0.25 (0.10, 0.64)/1,000 births and the highest rate of 1.59 (0.77, 3.27)/1,000 births. A framework of internal and external reviews of the clinical services was developed, that is able to tackle such clinical governance issues in a robust but sensitive manner. The outcome included specific improvements in service provision. The model is generally applicable and is thus suitable for use wherever such clinical governance issues are identified.
Article navigation
1 December 2003
This article was originally published in
Clinical Governance: An International Journal
Research Article|
December 01 2003
Responding to variations in mortality due to intrapartum asphyxia
S.C. Thomas;
S.C. Thomas
S.C. Thomas is a Research Midwife, at the University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
Z.E.S. Guildea;
Z.E.S. Guildea
Z.E.S. Guildea is a Lecturer, at the University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
J.H. Stewart;
J.H. Stewart
J.H. Stewart is a Research Midwife at the University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
P.H.T. Cartlidge
P.H.T. Cartlidge
P.H.T. Cartlidge is a Senior Lecturer in Child Health, at the University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6038
Print ISSN: 1477-7274
© MCB UP Limited
2003
Clinical Governance: An International Journal (2003) 8 (4): 296–299.
Citation
Thomas S, Guildea Z, Stewart J, Cartlidge P (2003), "Responding to variations in mortality due to intrapartum asphyxia". Clinical Governance: An International Journal, Vol. 8 No. 4 pp. 296–299, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14777270310499379
Download citation file:
155
Views
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Practice guidelines and clinical governance: do the means match with the ends? A quality appraisal of local practice guidelines
Clinical Governance: An International Journal (December,2003)
Modernising stroke services using clinical governance
Clinical Governance: An International Journal (January,2006)
Making clinical governance happen at team level: the Dorset experience
Clinical Governance: An International Journal (September,2004)
Clinical governance: assuring the sacred duty of trust to patients
Clinical Governance: An International Journal (January,2006)
It's good to talk: auditing clinicians' interactions with patients in a primary care setting
Clinical Governance: An International Journal (July,2013)
Related Chapters
And Because of them, I Can Fly
A Second Helping of Gumbo for the Soul: More Liberating Stories and Memories to Inspire Females of Color
Dying to Consume: Marketing and the Existentialization of Sustainability
Consumer Culture Theory
A Pandemic That Never Took Place: Discursivity, State of Exception, and
Hyperreality
Reconceptualizing State of Exception: European Lessons from the Pandemic
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
