Figure 1 The innovation paradox model. Source: Authors' development based on the theory of simulacra and hyperreality ( Baudrillard, 1981 ), sociomateriality ( Orlikowski and Scott, 2008 , 2015 ), algorithmic governance ( Introna, 2016 ; Gritsenko and Wood, 2022 ) and data management ( Alaimo an... More about this image found in The innovation paradox model. Source: Authors' development based on the the...

Figure 2 Typology of innovation simulacra. Source: Authors' development based on the theory of simulacra and hyperreality ( Baudrillard, 1981 ), concepts of digital materiality ( Leonardi, 2010 ; Yoo et al., 2012 ), algorithmic performance ( MacKenzie, 2018 ; Perdomo et al., 2020 ), platform ecosystems ( Parker et al., 2016 ; Cutolo and Kenney, 2021 ) and critical metrics studies ( Porter, 1995 ; Muller, 2018 ; Espeland and Sauder, 2007 ) More about this image found in Typology of innovation simulacra. Source: Authors' development based on the...

Figure 1 Research framework A flowchart shows the overall research framework, including network analysis, methods, procedures, results, and risk management stages. The flowchart shows a structured layout progressing from left to right across five vertical sections labeled “Network analysis”, “... More about this image found in Research framework A flowchart shows the overall research framework, inc...

Figure 2 Social risk-stakeholder 2-mode network A network diagram shows a number of stakeholders and social risk factors connected by lines across a central layout. The network diagram shows a layout arranged from left to right with interconnected nodes represented by circular icons and square... More about this image found in Social risk-stakeholder 2-mode network A network diagram shows a number ...

Figure 3 Correspondence distribution of social risks and related stakeholders A scatterplot shows stakeholders and social risks positioned across Dimension 1 and Dimension 2. The scatterplot shows a two-dimensional layout with points distributed across a horizontal axis labeled “DIMENSION 1” a... More about this image found in Correspondence distribution of social risks and related stakeholders A s...

Figure 4 Social risk network A network diagram shows social risk networks in URPs. The network diagram shows a dense web of interconnected circular nodes arranged from left to right, each representing a social risk factor and linked by numerous straight connecting lines. The nodes are depicted... More about this image found in Social risk network A network diagram shows social risk networks in URPs...

Figure 5 Centrality in social risk network A radar chart shows degree, betweenness, and closeness centrality across multiple labeled network nodes. The radar charts are arranged in two rows within a single figure. The top row contains two panels labeled “(a) Degree centrality” on the left and ... More about this image found in Centrality in social risk network A radar chart shows degree, betweennes...

Figure 6 Stakeholder network A network diagram shows interconnected stakeholders in URPs. The network diagram shows labeled square nodes connected by numerous straight lines, arranged from left to right across a single panel. At the top row, the nodes are labeled “Tenants” near the upper left ... More about this image found in Stakeholder network A network diagram shows interconnected stakeholders ...

Figure 7 Centrality in stakeholder network A radar chart shows degree, betweenness, and closeness centrality across multiple labeled network nodes. The radar charts are arranged in two rows within a single figure. The top row contains two panels labeled “(a) Degree centrality” on the left and ... More about this image found in Centrality in stakeholder network A radar chart shows degree, betweennes...

Figure 1 Conceptual model A model shows “Process Conflict” and “Outcome Conflict” linked through “Relational Governance” to “Project Performance”. The model shows relationships among conflict, governance, and performance. On the left, inside a dashed box, two stacked rectangles are labeled “Pr... More about this image found in Conceptual model A model shows “Process Conflict” and “Outcome Conflict”...

Figure 1 Understanding UE as a continuous process of sensemaking, a combination of the three theoretical perspectives Triangular conceptual framework integrating weak signal theory, sensemaking theory, and a practice perspective to explain the continuous management of unpredictable events. The... More about this image found in Understanding UE as a continuous process of sensemaking, a combination of t...

Figure 2 Integration of the three theoretical perspectives A conceptual model links weak signal theory and sensemaking theory through a practice perspective. The conceptual model consists of a central circular frame flanked by two other circles, all enclosed within a large dashed hexagonal bor... More about this image found in Integration of the three theoretical perspectives A conceptual model lin...

Figure 1 Scenarios for decision-making in innovation and project management in Industry 6.0. Source: Authors’ own work Quadrant scatter plot showing four scenarios mapped by Human-A I Collaboration and Cognitive Flexibility: A I-Controlled Rigidity, Tech-Driven Adaptability, Intuitive Mastery, ... More about this image found in Scenarios for decision-making in innovation and project management in Indus...