Skip to Main Content
Article navigation

ntroducing computerised working scheduling systems into a “not‐for‐ation, addressed by means of a case study based in a high security mental rise to four recommendations: that line authority is required; an “agent needed to push through the momentum of change; collaboration has ed; and because of inertia within the system, change is best implemented ground of crisis or turbulent conditions.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$41.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal