I summarize my views on democratic governance before responding to critics. Governance arose partly from the impact of modernist social science on public policy and it limits the space for democratic action. My preferred alternative is an interpretive social science inspiring more participatory and dialogic democratic practices. In defending these arguments, I concentrate on the nature of interpretive social science and its relation to democratic theory. I define interpretive social science in theoretical terms as based on recognition of the role of meanings in human life and the holistic and historical nature of meanings. This interpretive social science does not lead to any particular methods or topics, but it does rule out reified and deterministic appeals to structures. Democratic renewal depends on promoting interpretive social science, not institutional blueprints.
Article navigation
1 March 2011
Research Article|
March 01 2011
Response: Interpretive social science and democratic theory
Mark Bevir
Mark Bevir
Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1532-4273
Print ISSN: 1093-4537
Copyright © 2011 by PrAcademics Press
2011
licensed reuse rights only
International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior (2011) 14 (4): 576–596.
Citation
Bevir M (2011), "Response: Interpretive social science and democratic theory". International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, Vol. 14 No. 4 pp. 576–596, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-14-04-2011-B009
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Who interprets the world? Interpretive Social science and mark bevir’s democratic governance
International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior (March,2011)
Mark bevirʼs democratic governance in radical democratic perspective
International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior (March,2011)
A bridge to nowhere: connecting representative and radical models of democracy
International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior (March,2011)
Negotiating the narrow road between institutionalism and non-foundationalism, and the difference it makes
International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior (March,2011)
Putting experts in their place: the challenge of expanding participation while solving problems
International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior (March,2011)
Related Chapters
Black Bodies in Schools: Dewey’s Democratic Provision for Participation Confronts the Challenges of ‘Fundamental Plunder’
Dewey and Education in the 21st Century: Fighting Back
Building a knowledge society on sand – When the modernist project confronts the traditional cultural values in the Gulf
Education for a Knowledge Society in Arabian Gulf Countries
Being a Mother in/and the Pandemic: The Democratic Challenge of Zoom Teaching
The Kaleidoscope of Lived Curricula: Learning Through a Confluence of Crises 13th Annual Curriculum & Pedagogy Group 2021 Edited Collection
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
