Purpose – This paper seeks to present an overview of the state‐of‐the‐art of public performance measurement in the USA. The growing degree of sophistication of performance measurement tools is highlighted as well as some of the current challenges associated with implementing meaningful performance measurement systems. More importantly, models where citizens participate directly in the process of assessing and measuring the performance of government are introduced. Overall, this article aims to address the following questions: what is the state‐of‐the‐art of public performance measurement? How are citizens adding meaning to the performance measurement process? Design/methodology/approach – This paper offers a literature review that assesses the state of practice of performance measurement as a tool for management. In addition to highlighting the value of this management tool, models of citizen‐driven performance measurement are offered as strategies for measuring what matters to citizens. Findings – While there are challenges associated with implementing systems of performance measurement, evidence shows that including citizens in the process adds value to the overall process. Originality/value – This paper assesses the state‐of‐the‐art and utility of public performance measurement. Strategies and models are offered to bridge the interests of public managers and citizens in the process. These approaches, or modified versions, can be adopted and implemented in many contexts and may serve as useful tools for the international community.
Article navigation
1 October 2005
Editors
Review Article|
October 01 2005
Public performance measurement: An assessment of the state‐of‐the‐art and models for citizen participation Available to Purchase
Marc Holzer;
Marc Holzer
Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Kathryn Kloby
Kathryn Kloby
Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6658
Print ISSN: 1741-0401
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2005
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management (2005) 54 (7): 517–532.
Citation
Halachmi A, Holzer M, Kloby K (2005), "Public performance measurement: An assessment of the state‐of‐the‐art and models for citizen participation". International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 54 No. 7 pp. 517–532, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400510622205
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
A case productivity model for automatic climbing system
Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management (January,2014)
The Use of Throughput Efficiency as a Key Performance Measure for the New Manufacturing Era
The International Journal of Logistics Management (July,1993)
An overview of frequently used performance measures
Work Study (December,2003)
Designing operative productivity measures in public services
VINE (April,2009)
Factors that affect the design and implementation of team‐based performance measurement systems
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management (February,2006)
Related Chapters
Programme- and Project-Based Metropolitan Governance and Citizen Participation: A Case Study from the Helsinki Metropolitan Area
Metropolitan Ruralities
Citizen Participation in the Disaster Reconstruction Process: Lessons from the Great East Japan Earthquake
Recovering from Catastrophic Disaster in Asia
The Olympics, Soft Power, and Democratization: The Role of Bureaucracy
The Experience of Democracy and Bureaucracy in South Korea
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
