Provides a framework for analysing and accomplishing programme objectives, both in the public and private sectors. The framework provokes analysis beginning from what is the business of an agency to determining the appropriate mix of strategies for accomplishing programme objectives. The framework consists of seven critical components: evaluating the business of the agency; ascertaining the authority inherent in an office; understanding the operating environment– both the political and the non‐political environment; conducting inventory of resources to determine what is needed; selecting the appropriate techniques to accomplish the objectives; and finally evaluating the outcome. To demonstrate the application, two cases from the American political system were analysed. In analysing the case examples, it became apparent that the administrator who understood his mandate and the operating environment invariably developed the appropriate mix of strategies needed to accomplish programme objectives. On the other hand, the administrator who lacked reasonable appreciation of the operating environment, but seemed to understand only his mandate,had trouble developing any effective stratagems for accomplishing programme objectives.
Article navigation
1 February 1994
Research Article|
February 01 1994
A Generic Framework for Programme Management: The Cases of Robert Moses and Miles Mahoney in the US
Damien D. Ejigiri
Damien D. Ejigiri
Southern University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6666
Print ISSN: 0951-3558
© MCB UP Limited
1994
International Journal of Public Sector Management (1994) 7 (1): 53–66.
Citation
Ejigiri DD (1994), "A Generic Framework for Programme Management: The Cases of Robert Moses and Miles Mahoney in the US". International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 7 No. 1 pp. 53–66, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513559410051291
Download citation file:
185
Views
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Machiavelli and modern management
Management Decision (April,2002)
Public management: Failing accountabilities and failing performance review
International Journal of Public Sector Management (September,1996)
Rethinking relationships in governing: some Weberian distinctions
Journal of Management History (Archive) (March,1996)
INFORMAL DISCUSSION. MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES.
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers (August,1970)
In the line of deregulatory fire
The TQM Magazine (February,1996)
Related Chapters
Commonalities and Differences in Public and Private Sector Performance Management Practices: A Literature Review
Performance Measurement and Management Control: Contemporary Issues
Boundaries of Business Actors and Networks – Theoretical and Methodological Reflections
No Business is an Island: Making Sense of the Interactive Business World
Using a “Project Management Mindset” as an Administrative Approach to Creating Workplace Efficiencies & Building Employee Leadership Skills
Project Management in the Library Workplace
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
