Bentham’s penal theory persuaded him that convict transportation was inherently inferior to imprisonment as a punishment for serious crime. The transportation of convicts to New South Wales also threatened his plans to build a panopticon penitentiary. This penitentiary, he thought, would demonstrate the superiority of a prison run for profit by a private contractor over alternative schemes of convict management. In the process, it would also make him a fortune. His repeated attempts to persuade the British Government to abandon the New South Wales penal colony and to honour its commitment to his panopticon project, however, came to nothing. Neither the Government’s acceptance of Bentham’s key theoretical arguments nor its avowed support for his penitentiary scheme was sufficient to prompt it to act. Bentham found that winning the main theoretical argument was not enough. He was continually forced to concentrate on side issues and on particular and largely incidental matters of fact. As it turned out, the particular and the incidental combined to carry the day against his panopticon.
Article navigation
1 March 1998
Case Report|
March 01 1998
Jeremy Bentham and the New South Wales convicts Available to Purchase
R.V. Jackson
R.V. Jackson
University of Queensland, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6712
Print ISSN: 0306-8293
© MCB UP Limited
1998
International Journal of Social Economics (1998) 25 (2-3-4): 370–379.
Citation
Jackson R (1998), "Jeremy Bentham and the New South Wales convicts". International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 25 No. 2-3-4 pp. 370–379, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299810193641
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Prescriptive versus non‐prescriptive prison design briefs: Architect responses to interpreting Australian private prison design briefs
Facilities (April,2005)
Measuring health service satisfaction: female inmates
Int J Health Care Qual Assur (July,2003)
The evaluation of private prison design and construction submissions in Australia: prison operator responses
Facilities (April,2004)
Convict labor at the Sumitomo Besshi copper mine in Japan
International Journal of Social Economics (March,1998)
Public crime, private punishment: prison privatization in Queensland
International Journal of Social Economics (April,1996)
Related Chapters
Chapter 12 Immigration: America's Nineteenth-Century “Law and Order Problem?”
Migration and Culture
The Trajectory of Penal Markets in a Period of Austerity: The Case of England and Wales
Punishment and Incarceration: A Global Perspective
Introduction
The COMPASS Model in Criminal and Forensic Psychology
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
