Article navigation

Discusses the privatization of public goods and services in urban areas. Examines the common assumption that shifting responsibility for providing goods and services to private individuals will increase the sense of community or “social capital” that binds residents of an urban area together. Argues that privatization of goods such as public safety, education or community recreation may result in more spatially limited social capital, where individuals are less willing to cooperate for the common good. Shrinking the spatial dimensions of “community” to include only members of the same housing development or neighborhood may impose other costs to local governments that offset the expected savings from privatization.

You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options