Procurement processes for automated library systems need examination to determine if libraries are choosing the best methods for getting the best return on their investment. Understanding the costs involved and how typical decisions in procurement procedures add to the costs of systems will allow libraries to judge if the process better serves the library than using the money in other ways. Alternative processes including standardized request‐for‐proposals, contracts and understanding how to utilize lawyers and consultants are suggested in an attempt to show that procurement processes could achieve the same goals using different methods while allowing libraries to use their money to purchase other goods and/or services. The benefits of the implementation of such processes are also reviewed.
Article navigation
Research Article|
December 01 1999
Choose wisely: making the library’s money work for the library in the system procurement process
Carl Grant
Carl Grant
Carl Grant is President, Ex‐Libris (USA) Inc., Draper, Utah, USA.
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-6909
Print ISSN: 0307-4803
© MCB UP Limited
1999
New Library World (1999) 100 (7): 302–306.
Citation
Grant C (1999), "Choose wisely: making the library’s money work for the library in the system procurement process". New Library World, Vol. 100 No. 7 pp. 302–306, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03074809910299180
Download citation file:
116
Views
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
On the quality and usefulness of the specification in determining a customer’s requirements: a survey of UK library system suppliers
OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives (December,2000)
New CIC consultants contract
Structural Survey (August,2006)
The “agent effect” on business divorce
Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing (January,2005)
Involvement of technical consultants in high technology business markets
Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing (April,1997)
Factors affecting the bid/no bid decision in the Palestinian construction industry
Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction (August,2010)
Related Chapters
How markets work: The lawyer’s version W. Mark C. Weidemaier and Mitu Gulati are on the faculties of the University of North Carolina Law School and Duke University Law School, respectively. An earlier version of this article was presented at the conference on Socializing Economic Relationships: New Perspectives and Methods for Transnational Risk Regulation, at the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies at the University of Oxford. We thank Bettina Lange, Dania Thomas, and conference participants for comments on the article.
From Economy to Society? Perspectives on Transnational Risk Regulation
Lawyers and Judges Utilizing History: A Multifaceted Tool for the Profession, 1840–1960
Studies in Law, Politics, and Society
Lawyers, Veterans, and the Durability of US Democracy
Is Democracy Doomed?
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
