Nine planetary boundaries have been proposed, capturing essential biophysical processes that sustain the Earth System and its biosphere in an accommodating state for humanity. Drawing on economics literature, we propose conditions under which remaining within these boundaries is in line with economic policy. We assert that pervasive uncertainties combined with impacts of trespassing planetary boundaries clearly legitimate using safe minimum standards or precautionary approaches. Moreover, information about the risk structure of these processes, including potential large-scale regime shifts, could help refine policies for how to relate to the zones of uncertainty of the boundaries. Planetary boundaries may be interpreted as "growth within limits" especially in relation to the biophysical expansion of the human dimension. Here, we picture them as warning signs creating incentives for shifting development into new directions, new pathways, where growth in human well-being is the focus rather than growth in GDP. In this sense, we reiterate the framework of ecological economics of sustainable scale (i.e., developing within planetary boundaries), efficient allocation, and fair distribution, and emphasize the need for "biosphere economics" to help navigate globalization within the capacity of the biosphere as the complex adaptive system it truly is.
Article navigation
20 May 2015
Research Article|
May 20 2015
The Economy, The Biosphere and Planetary Boundaries: Towards Biosphere Economics
Anne-Sophie Crépin;
Anne-Sophie Crépin
The Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics,
The Royal SwedishAcademy of Sciences
, Box 50005, 10405 Stockholm, Sweden
The Stockholm Resilience Centre,
Stockholm University
, Stockholm, Sweden
Search for other works by this author on:
Carl Folke
Carl Folke
The Stockholm Resilience Centre,
Stockholm University
, Stockholm, Sweden
Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study (STIAS),
WallenbergResearch Centre at Stellenbosch University
South Africa
Search for other works by this author on:
We are grateful for useful comments from four anonymous reviewers, LineGordon and Matìas Piaggio, assistance from Daniel Ospina and funding from theEbba and Sven Schwartz foundation. Carl Folke acknowledges the support of STIAS, Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study.
Online ISSN: 1932-1473
Print ISSN: 1932-1465
© 2015 A. Crépin and C. Folke
2015
A. Crépin and C. Folke
Licensed re-use rights only
International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics (2015) 8 (1): 57–100.
Citation
Crépin A, Folke C (2015), "The Economy, The Biosphere and Planetary Boundaries: Towards Biosphere Economics". International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 8 No. 1 pp. 57–100, doi: https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000066
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Terrestrial ecosystem loss and biosphere collapse
Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal (August,2014)
The imperatives of Biosphere conservation and wise Homosphere development
International Journal of Social Economics (July,1998)
Working values: relationships between individual and organisational biospheric values, efficacy beliefs and pro-environmental behaviour at work
Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance (May,2026)
The contribution of the UNESCO biosphere reserve concept to urban resilience
Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal (July,2006)
A systematic review of Asian community participation in biosphere reserves
PSU Research Review: An International Journal (June,2021)
Related Chapters
SDGs in Large-Company-Sized Communities: The Example of the Isle of Man Biosphere Reserve
Business in the 21st Century: A Sustainable Approach
P11 Sensitivity analysis of biospheric behaviour of radionuclides released from nuclear waste repositories
RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT
Planetary Emergency and Paradox
Interdisciplinary Dialogues on Organizational Paradox: Learning from Belief and Science, Part A
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
