Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

This study examines the impact of executive alumni network centrality on corporate greenwashing behaviour among Chinese A-share listed companies. Grounded in social network theory and institutional complementarity theory, it investigates the mechanisms, namely information transmission, social supervision and reputation maintenance, through which informal alumni networks shape corporate environmental governance. The research further explores the interactive effects between alumni networks and formal institutional governance, including intellectual property protection, legal systematisation and marketisation. Additionally, it analyses heterogeneous effects across ownership structure, market position, institutional investor ownership and pollution intensity.

Design/methodology/approach

Employing a panel dataset comprising 1,012 Chinese A-share listed firms with 10,238 firm-year observations spanning 2009–2022, this study utilises social network analysis conducted via Pajek software to construct four centrality measures, degree, closeness, betweenness and eigenvector, synthesised through principal component analysis. Corporate greenwashing is operationalised using both the Bloomberg-Wind discrepancy method and the TF-IDF text similarity approach. Ordinary least squares regression models incorporating industry and year fixed effects are estimated with firm-clustered robust standard errors. Endogeneity is addressed through instrumental variable estimation, Heckman two-stage selection correction and propensity score matching.

Findings

The empirical results demonstrate that greater executive alumni network centrality significantly attenuates corporate greenwashing behaviour. Formal institutional governance, encompassing intellectual property protection, legal systematisation and marketisation, exhibits a complementary rather than substitutive relationship with alumni networks, jointly reinforcing the suppression of greenwashing. Heterogeneity analyses reveal that this inhibiting effect is more pronounced among state-owned enterprises, firms occupying superior market positions, companies characterised by higher institutional investor ownership and entities operating within heavily polluting industries. These findings remain robust across alternative variable operationalisations, endogeneity corrections and multiple sensitivity analyses.

Originality/value

This study contributes to the literature in three respects. Firstly, it pioneers the incorporation of executive alumni networks into the corporate environmental governance framework, elucidating how informal institutions mitigate greenwashing through information, supervision and reputational channels, thereby extending beyond the prevailing focus on formal regulatory mechanisms. Secondly, it advances institutional complementarity theory by demonstrating synergistic effects between formal and informal governance within the environmental domain. Thirdly, it offers differentiated empirical evidence across ownership types, market positions, investor structures and pollution intensities, furnishing actionable implications for policymakers formulating targeted environmental regulations in China's transitional economy.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal

Gift article access

As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Please sign in to your personal account to gift article access.

Register

Gift article access

As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Gift articles remaining: --

Gift article access

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.

Gift articles remaining: --

Gift article access

As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.

Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses.

You have reached the limit of 10 links within a 30 day period.