Article navigation
Purpose

This study aims to explain how manufacturers strengthen their standing in triadic channel networks (manufacturer–agent–retailer) by blending asset-specific investments, financial incentives and guanxi building. It assesses how the number of agents (single vs multiple) and agent size condition these effects.

Design/methodology/approach

Matched questionnaires from marketing and sales managers at 210 Taiwanese agent firms were analyzed with structural equation modeling to test the research framework.

Findings

Asset-specific investments and guanxi, rather than financial incentives, enhance retailers’ commitment to the manufacturer. Heightened retailer commitment subsequently increases agents’ dependence on the manufacturer. This indirect effect intensifies when several agents serve the same market and when agents are relatively small.

Research limitations/implications

The cross-sectional, single-country setting limits causal inference and generalizability. Longitudinal, multi-country studies using data from all three channel members are encouraged.

Practical implications

Manufacturers can offset power imbalances by investing in retailer-direct resources and nurturing guanxi, while tactically appointing multiple, smaller agents to spur competition without destabilizing the channel.

Originality/value

By integrating economic, structural and relational governance mechanisms, this study clarifies how structural ties reshape inter-firm dependence in multilayer business channels, thus broadening B2B channel governance theory.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Pay-Per-View Access
$41.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options