Continuing pressure to increase business competitiveness means that organisations are looking for new ways in which to increase efficiency and reduce costs. The old adage says that a company's greatest asset is its people. It is also business law that improving the returns achieved on assets can increase profitability. In terms of staff costs, that could mean increasing productivity, or reducing time lost through staff absence. This paper focuses on absence management, a growing trend in the USA, and one set to spread through the UK. In particular, the paper considers the specific communications issues raised by actively managing absence in the UK. This paper examines how an active approach to absence management could be seen as a challenge to the psychological contract between employer and employee. If any such policy is to succeed there has to be open communication between staff, line managers and senior management about the business case for adopting a new approach. Those responsible for communicating the policy require a clear understanding of the business issues involved, foresight as to the benefits and threats to staff, and an honest appraisal of the organisation's existing culture which will determine how easily absence management objectives can be fulfilled.
Article navigation
1 February 1998
Review Article|
February 01 1998
Who is responsible for managing absence? Available to Purchase
Karen Gamble;
Karen Gamble
Towers Perrin, Castlewood House, 77–91 New Oxford Street, London
Search for other works by this author on:
Keith Mainland
Keith Mainland
Towers Perrin, Castlewood House, 77–91 New Oxford Street, London
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1478-0852
Print ISSN: 1363-254X
© MCB UP Limited
1998
Journal of Communication Management (1998) 2 (4): 396–402.
Citation
Gamble K, Mainland K (1998), "Who is responsible for managing absence?". Journal of Communication Management, Vol. 2 No. 4 pp. 396–402, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb023480
Download citation file:
249
Views
Suggested Reading
Lou Pondy and the Organizational Funny Bone
Journal of Organizational Change Management (February,1989)
The 100 best companies to work for
Human Resource Management International Digest (July,2010)
Total Quality Management : Another Mast to String Your Flag to, or a Means to Change a Company’s Culture?
The TQM Magazine (October,1994)
Executive Communication in Crisis
Executive Development (March,1992)
Employee benefits provision: Can it impact on talent retention, motivation and productivity levels?
Human Resource Management International Digest (June,2010)
Related Chapters
Crowdfunding Seen through the Lens of the Psychological Contract
International Perspectives on Crowdfunding: Positive, Normative and Critical Theory
Psychological Contract and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A New Deal for New Generations?
Advances in Hospitality and Leisure
The Impact of the Psychological Contract on Institutional Performance: A Case Study of the Social Security Institution in Jordan
Comprehensive Insights in Technological Sustainability, Education and Business: Exploring Diverse Perspectives and Impactful Strategies
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
