Skip to Main Content
Article navigation

Recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) is rapidly emerging as a viable structural material; however, its comparatively weaker microstructure poses challenges for bond and splice behaviour, which are critical to structural safety. This review systematically analyses 38 experimental and numerical studies concerning the effects of RAC replacement ratio, reinforcement type, and confinement systems on bond and splice behaviour. When fully replacing natural aggregate, RAC demonstrates a bonding capacity approximately 25% lower, primarily due to the porous nature of the interfacial transition zone. Consequently, the required splice lengths under unconfined conditions are 35–40 bar diameters for steel reinforcement and 60–75 bar diameters for fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcement. Confinement strategies, particularly transverse reinforcement and external FRP wrapping, effectively mitigate brittle splitting failures and promote ductile behaviour. Current design codes (ACI 318; Eurocode 2), calibrated for natural-aggregate concrete, inadequately address the distinct properties of RAC. To bridge this gap, this review proposes a recycled-aggregate reduction factor (ψr), analogous to the lightweight-concrete factor in existing codes. This factor provides engineers with a code-compliant methodology for the safe design of RACs, supporting the broader adoption of sustainable construction materials.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal