The continuous need for change in corporate real estate spaces warrants consideration of flexibility in new space design. To help decision makers invest more effectively in physical infrastructure and its ability to evolve, a formal method of identifying and valuing flexibility is developed. A model, based on real options techniques for valuing managerial flexibility, is constructed to answer the following question: how much is it worth to invest in a space that could be renovated to office space for a specified renovation cost in the future? Decision makers can use the option valuation results to determine whether the initial design and construction costs to achieve flexibility are justifiable. The transparent model is intended to be accessible to design teams in practice. It is an improvement on net present value and first‐cost based decision‐making techniques in that it explicitly accounts for uncertainty and for the ability of managers to make a rational future decision (between renting and renovating). The model considers three sources of uncertainty: the market price of rent for office space (as measured by volatility); date of space need; and amount of space need. Input values and/or probability distributions are needed for these variables. The model is constructed using a binomial lattice technique and Monte Carlo simulation. Results are given in a format that allows for comparison with cost estimates of physical architectural designs. For example, in a case study where current five‐year office‐space leases are estimated at US$98 per square foot and 0.39 annual volatility and the mean amount of space needed in the future is 50 per cent of the total, the real options valuation suggests that it is worth up to US$40 per square foot in initial investment expenses to achieve a space that could be renovated to office space for US$25 per square foot within the next eight years. The concept of addressing risk through ‘flexible design’ and analysing the value of flexibility is pertinent to judicious management of any new building project that is subject to uncertain future conditions.
Article navigation
1 March 2005
Conceptual Paper|
March 01 2005
A real options model for valuing flexible space Available to Purchase
Lara Greden;
Lara Greden
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, 5‐418, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; Tel: +1 617 452 2286; Fax: +1 617 253 6152; e‐mail: lgreden@mit.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1479-1048
Print ISSN: 1463-001X
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2005
Journal of Corporate Real Estate (2005) 7 (1): 34–48.
Citation
Greden L, Glicksman L (2005), "A real options model for valuing flexible space". Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Vol. 7 No. 1 pp. 34–48, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14630010510812486
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Testing the waters: using collective real options to manage the social dilemma of strategic alliances
Strategic Direction (March,2012)
Land-use change and solar energy production: a real option approach
Agricultural Finance Review (November,2013)
Dynamic transfer pricing under conditions of uncertainty – the use of real options
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change (October,2019)
International supply chain agility ‐ Tradeoffs between flexibility and uncertainty
International Journal of Operations & Production Management (May,2001)
An analysis of timing decision in venture capital staged financing: evidence from India
Management Research Review (June,2020)
Related Chapters
A Canadian Immigration Model for Europe? Labour Market Uncertainty and Migration Policy in Canada, Germany and Spain
Labour Mobility in the Enlarged Single European Market
The Forgotten Options: Progress of Real Options Perspective in HRM Research and Agenda for Future Research
Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management
On the Role of Option Applications in Economic Instability
Derivative Securities Pricing and Modelling
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
