Value-at-Risk Forecasting using Realized Volatility Models and GARCH-type Models

The aim of this paper is to compare the performance of VaR (value-at-risk) using Realized Volatility Models (which use intraday returns) with VaR the performance of GARCH-type Models (which use daily returns) with three different distribution innovations (normal distribution, t-distribution, skewed t-distribution). In this paper, we empirically examine VaR forecast of korean stock market using KOSPI and KOSDAQ. Empirical results indicate that the Realized Volatility models is superior to the GARCH-type models in forecasting VaR. We also find Var forecast by skewed t-distribution model are more accurate than those using the normal and t-distribution models. Thus, VaR using Realized Volatility models and skewed t-distribution enhances the performance of risk management in Korean financial markets.