An important part of the knowledge required for designing the envelope of a new building is based on experience. Confronted with a building envelope design problem, a human expert adds to well‐established domain knowledge his/her own experience or the experience of others, to support his/her reasoning process, and to guide him/her in stereotypical situations. Based on that observation, we can conclude that the building envelope design fits well the description associated with the so‐called “weak theory domains”, and is a prime candidate for adopting a case‐based reasoning (CBR) approach. Proposes strategies to encode, organize, and compare prototypical building envelope cases within a CBR framework for selecting the construction alternatives during the preliminary stage of the building envelope design. The methodology presented aims to find the most suitable design alternative for a new building envelope from a library of prototypical building cases.
Article navigation
1 December 2001
This article was originally published in
Logistics Information Management
Research Article|
December 01 2001
Similarity assessment in a case‐based reasoning framework for building envelope design Available to Purchase
Serban Iliescu;
Serban Iliescu
Centre for Building Studies, Department of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Paul Fazio;
Paul Fazio
Centre for Building Studies, Department of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Krishnan Gowri
Krishnan Gowri
Batelle Pacific Northwest National Laboratories, Richland, Washington, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7948
Print ISSN: 0957-6053
© MCB UP Limited
2001
Logistics Information Management (2001) 14 (5-6): 376–386.
Citation
Iliescu S, Fazio P, Gowri K (2001), "Similarity assessment in a case‐based reasoning framework for building envelope design". Logistics Information Management, Vol. 14 No. 5-6 pp. 376–386, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006249
Download citation file:
129
Views
Suggested Reading
Online personalization: the key to engaging the learner
Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal (December,2007)
Rule capture of automated compliance checking of building requirements: a review
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Smart Infrastructure and Construction (July,2023)
Critical analysis of mental health research among construction project professionals
Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology (September,2020)
Setting the stage for service experience: design strategies for functional services
Journal of Service Management (October,2016)
Methodological issues in design‐construction integration
Logistics Information Management (December,2001)
Related Chapters
Railway Station and Interchange Design: A Station Design that Perfectly Fits the Quality Needs of Passengers
Sustainable Railway Engineering and Operations
Evaluation Noir: The Other Side of the Experience
Case Study Evaluation: Past, Present and Future Challenges
Measuring the Quality of Destinations: A Portuguese Case Study
Knowledge Transfer to and within Tourism: Academic, Industry and Government Bridges
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
