The purpose of this study was to evaluate different effluent treatment options for Atlantic Canadian seafood processing plants. Bench-scale testing with a 25-mesh screen, sedimentation (SED), and dissolved air flotation (DAF) was conducted. Treatment by SED and DAF was successful in reducing contaminant concentrations with maximum observed percent reductions: biochemical oxygen demand, BOD5 (90%); chemical oxygen demand, COD (60%); turbidity (99%); total suspended solids, TSS (95%); and ammonia nitrogen, NH3-N (50%). Bench-scale 25-mesh screen runs for select effluent types showed poor reduction efficiencies and appeared to provide inadequate removal of contaminants. Sedimentation and DAF using alum were effective at removing solids but less effective at removing soluble effluent components. Improved performance may be possible with further treatment technology optimization on an effluent specific basis.
Article navigation
November 2013
Research Article|
November 01 2013
Evaluation of treatment options for Atlantic Canadian seafood processing plant effluent
Bryan Lee Jamieson;
Bryan Lee Jamieson
Department of Civil and Resources Engineering, Center of Water Resources Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3J 1Z1, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Alex Augusto Gonçalves;
Alex Augusto Gonçalves
Department of Civil and Resources Engineering, Center of Water Resources Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3J 1Z1, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Graham A. Gagnon
Graham A. Gagnon
Department of Civil and Resources Engineering, Center of Water Resources Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3J 1Z1, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
August 01 2008
Accepted:
August 01 2009
Online ISSN: 1496-256X
Print ISSN: 1496-2551
This paper is being republished with the permission of NRC Research Press. It was originally submitted to the Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science and subsequently published in the Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. The correct citation follows: Jamieson BL, Gonçalves AA, Gagnon GA. 2010. Evaluation of treatment options for Atlantic Canadian seafood processing plant effluent. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 37(1): 167–178 DOI: 10.1139/L09-127
ICE Publishing: All rights reserved
2013
Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science (2013) 8 (4): 448–460.
Article history
Received:
August 01 2008
Accepted:
August 01 2009
Citation
Jamieson BL, Gonçalves AA, Gagnon GA (2013), "Evaluation of treatment options for Atlantic Canadian seafood processing plant effluent". Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science, Vol. 8 No. 4 pp. 448–460, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jees.2013.0045
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Monitoring spatial and temporal variations of phosphorus within a cold climate subsurface flow constructed wetland
Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science (January,2004)
Note of Appreciation / Note de Reconnaissance
Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science (January,2004)
Erratum: Inactivation of Ascaris suum eggs in digested and dewatered biosolids with lime and fly ash at bench scale and full scale
Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science (January,2004)
Preliminary evaluation of the use of fatty acid ratios for tracking the potential for nitrite accumulation in nitrifying reactors with low carbon to nitrogen ratio
Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science (January,2004)
Corrigendum: Photolysis of aqueous free chlorine species (HOCl and OCl−) with 254 nm ultraviolet light
Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science (November,2013)
Related Chapters
Health, safety and welfare
Initial Professional Development for Civil Engineers
Sustainable development
Initial Professional Development for Civil Engineers
The Experience of Environmental Barriers among Adults with Disabilities: A National Description
Environmental Contexts and Disability
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
