Nitrate, arsenic and vanadium are all potential groundwater contaminants. Various resource constraints can make conventional treatment methodologies, such as ion exchange and membrane processing, challenging to implement for small utilities. This research examined the potential of biological denitrification withParacoccus denitrificans and adsorption to ferric hydroxide precipitates to simultaneously remove nitrate and either arsenic or vanadium. Continuous bench-scale testing found that average nitrate removal of up to 60% was obtained. The continuous bench-scale testing also found that arsenic and vanadium were both removed by way of adsorption to ferric hydroxide precipitates. The average per cent removal for arsenic and vanadium were 81·5% and 91·1% when 2 mg/L of iron was added. In fact, arsenic concentrations were below 10 μg/L following addition of 2 mg/L of iron. This bench-scale system demonstrates the potential of integrating bio-adsorption for co-contaminant removal, which could hold promise for small communities requiring an innovative approach to simultaneously remove contaminants.
Article navigation
September 2014
Research Article|
September 01 2014
Biological removal of nitrate with arsenic adsorption
Jordan J. Schmidt, MASc;
Jordan J. Schmidt, MASc
Graduate student
Department of Civil and Resource Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Graham A. Gagnon, PhD, PEng
Graham A. Gagnon, PhD, PEng
Professor
Department of Civil and Resource Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
November 01 2013
Accepted:
July 11 2014
Online ISSN: 1496-256X
Print ISSN: 1496-2551
ICE Publishing: All rights reserved
2014
Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science (2014) 9 (3): 187–193.
Article history
Received:
November 01 2013
Accepted:
July 11 2014
Citation
Schmidt JJ, Gagnon GA (2014), "Biological removal of nitrate with arsenic adsorption". Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science, Vol. 9 No. 3 pp. 187–193, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jees.13.00006
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Photochemical aqueous mercury removal: effects of DOM and DO
Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science (October,2016)
A tracer study of the danger posed to a chalk aquifer by contaminated highway run-off
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water Maritime and Energy (March,1992)
Use of calcium carbonate as a wet contact filter
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water and Maritime Engineering (September,2003)
Well rehabilitation in Rasht: a system dynamics approach
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water Management (May,2011)
Using community data to improve rural water infrastructure in India
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Civil Engineering (May,2021)
Related Chapters
Groundwater control
ICE Manual of Geotechnical Engineering, Volume II: Geotechnical design, construction and verification
Predict Environmental Conditions Using Groundwater Interpretation in Subdistrict Hamparan Perak, Deli Serdang, North Sumatera
Proceedings of MICoMS 2017
Groundwater
The Essence of Geotechnical Engineering: 60 years of Géotechnique
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
